Works created by accused sexual abusers separated from their misdeeds – The Lamron



[ad_1]

There has been a series of disturbing reports about famous men committing badual misconduct: Harvey Weinstein, Ben Affleck, Kevin Spacey, Jeffrey Tambor, Brett Ratner, Louis CK, Matt Lauer and many others have been accused of varying levels of misconduct. to absolute criminal behavior.

Weinstein was fired from his own studio, the Spacey show "House of Cards" took him off the helm and may end without him and the release of the new Louis C. K movie has been canceled.

Before the silence and the silent acceptance of this type of behavior allowed the programs, movies or other entertainment products of the badual aggressors to continue. This new wave of courageous confessions of the victims has turned Hollywood into a new page, one of responsibility and consequences.

This new sheet has caused many admirers of the accused men to be justly upset. Many people ask themselves whether or not it is appropriate to love, or at least appreciate, the work these men have done.

It is common in media badysis to separate the creator from creation, and from a purely intellectual point of view, this makes complete sense. After a work has been released to the public, it is no longer solely the creation of the writer or the actors. Many beloved works of the past would not exist if we had had people as responsible for their actions as we do now.

Disney films have a special place in many hearts, despite the early and heinous racism of the studio, and Bill Cosby's "The Cosby Show" pioneered on many levels and earned him the title of "America & # 39; s Dad. "

But the line has to be drawn between the appreciation of the content of the accused abusers and the material support of these men, which sometimes is not so easy to do. For example, Weinstein was fired, and this was appropriate to remove him from the position that allowed him to use his power over his victims.

In addition, Spacey was eliminated from "House of Cards", which was the best way to prevent other incidents like the one reported by an anonymous production badistant.

In addition, Matt Lauer, the host of NBC News Today, was fired from his job on Wednesday, November 29 after a review for badual misconduct. The familiar face that had been received in homes across the United States was accused of inappropriate behavior with a co-worker who started at the 2014 Sochi Olympics and extends beyond that event.

The company was quick to eliminate Lauer from his position, since they had credible reasons to believe that his behavior was more than an isolated incident. In all cases where a particular decision can protect past and potential victims, it must be executed.

We can not allow these prominent individuals to keep their jobs, when in many cases their occupations were vehicles that used to find and silence the victims. The reduction of their creations can be difficult in the short term, but it allows the potential of new creators who might otherwise have been silenced by their attackers to make their own mark on our cultural landscape.

Does this mean that you can not see Pulp Fiction because it was created by the Weinstein production company? No. Appreciation for the media these people created is not necessarily a bad thing. As long as the person is considered responsible and has a complete understanding of the person behind the work, it is completely legitimate to enjoy their projects.

However, if they have not been held responsible, there is something powerful in boycotting any other content they believe. Abusers use their power, their praise and their money to implicitly and explicitly push their victims into silence.

If we continue to allow these abusers to maintain their prestige, what we are saying is that we care more about their programs and films than about the lives of real people, which is unforgivable.

[ad_2]
Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.