There are potential downsides to the rumored Fox / Disney deal if that means that "Logan-style" movies They would be among the victims.
As soon as the rumor that Disney bought 21st Century Fox first appeared on the Internet, rumors about a possibility that such an acquisition made possible threatened to stifle any other discussion on the subject. Could it be true? people asked. Could Marvel regain control of the Fantastic Four and the X-Men movies again? Well, yes … but that might not be the best outcome for everyone involved.
There are two distinct elements to any potential merger of Fox's Marvel properties and Marvel's cinematic universe: the narrative and the practical. Based on the reaction to speculation that a Fox / Disney deal is imminent, it is obvious that the fans are very enthusiastic about the former and do not pay much attention to the latter at all.
It's easy to see why. Discovering how to insert the mythologies Fantastic Four and X-Men in MCU is a fun puzzle, with a final result that comic fans have fantasized for almost a decade: a "complete" Marvel universe on the big screen. It is not surprising that social networks are full of story ideas, continuity patches and wish lists for the cast. (As much as I like the Fantastic Four and X-Men, my personal reason for getting excited about this possibility is based almost entirely on the idea of seeing Doctor Doom as melodramatic as the comic book version that threatens anyone and everyone in the world. MCU Do not embarrass me .)
However, you are paying less than you would such a merger of fictitious universes. Not that X-Men the film canon covering the last 17 years would be abandoned, but given the confusion and inconsistency that continuity has become, it could be said that it would not be a great loss, nor that the cast of the current incarnations of the characters will probably be replaced. With the exception of Ryan Reynolds, it could be argued that Hugh Jackman was the only irreplaceable actor in the franchise, and that he already stepped aside as Wolverine after Logan this year. (There have already been several screen versions of Professor X, Magneto, Storm, Cyclops, Jean Gray, etc., making any future recast seem much more acceptable.)
No, the real problem is that Fox's approach to the properties, specifically the X-Men auxiliary properties, are unlikely to double if it is bent into the larger Marvel machine.
After all, Marvel's whole sales argument is that everything takes place within the same fictional universe. Actually, that has proven to be a somewhat theoretical exercise: beyond the Easter eggs, is there really any connection between, say, the MCU of the movies and Hulu Runaways or ABC Inhumans ? But the notion that the properties of X-Men fit into the MCU reduces the narrative possibilities that Fox has begun to explore with projects like The Gifted Legion and Logan that omits the main timeline of mythology to tell stories that require independent worlds to function to their full potential.
In addition, despite everything, Marvel's output has tried to experiment with tone and genre, there is uniformity in the screen in each of its properties on the screen: the shows are similar in terms of visual aesthetics and their range Tonal exists in a narrow spectrum between "slightly snarky action adventure" and "very snarky action adventure". The studio has yet to demonstrate any desire or ability to produce a Logan or, based on the distinctly dreaded trailer of terror, next year New mutants .
Similarly, Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige has played any chance of a R-rated Marvel movie, which could leave the future of the Ryan Reynolds series Deadpool – one of the few Fox franchises that could have continued under new administration, given the character's ability to simply tell the public directly that it has new owners and a new universe to explore, in doubt. (Reynolds has even joked about the possibility of a more familiar Deadpool for Disney, tweeting on November 6 "If this is true, I wonder how it would affect Deadpool?")
For all the excitement of the fans around a potential Marvel acquisition of the Fox / Marvel franchises, there is an exchange that would happen few seem to be considering: yes, Marvel is likely to be a pair of safer hands for these properties, and yes, it would be a opportunity to recreate the universe of comics on screen. But what would be lost would be Fox's confused will to experience and remake the properties, and because of that, the heights that come from something like Logan . That could be a price comic that fans are willing to pay, but what about the rest of the audience?