Trump’s attacks on Syria last year were quite popular

[ad_1]

Almost exactly a year ago, President Trump was basically in the same situation in Syria where he is today: deciding whether to cancel his non-interventionist tendencies and respond militarily to a deadly attack with chemical weapons that killed to dozens of people.

Trump ended up authorizing an attack on a Syrian military airfield, and it quickly became one of his most popular foreign policy decisions to date, both among Republican and American lawmakers. Two-thirds of Americans approved, including nearly 90 percent of Republicans and a remarkable 48 percent of Democrats, according to a Fox News poll in April 2017.

For a president who seems to thrive with the approval of The rest, public opinion Trump received The last time he made the final decision to attack Syria is something he is surely considering now while weighing what to do.

Trump was not always so sure what to do. After the first chemical attack in Syria during his administration, we got an almost perfect test case of how hard the president will backfire within his own party if he decides not to respond.

When the 2017 chemical attack took place for the first time, Trump issued a desert statement that blamed President Barack Obama for that, but offered no retaliatory response. He was harshly criticized by Republican hacker legislators for that. Senator Marco Rubio accused the Trump administration of giving the green light to the president of Syria to launch a chemical attack, and noted that Trump's secretary of state had suggested days before the administration could allow the Syrian president to remain in power. .

What Rubio said is parallel to the serious accusations that Trump is now facing by Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.), Who suggested that Trump could be the culprit of the second gas attack by telegraphing days before he wanted to get out of the country. [19659007] Days after receiving Republican criticism last year, Trump looked like a totally different president when he finally decided to launch missile attacks. The main Republicans in Congress responded to Trump's 180 with one of their own, encouraging the president in a way they had never done before.

"Unlike the previous administration, President Trump faced a crucial moment in Syria and took action." McCain and Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (RS.C.) said in a joint statement.

Not everyone in Trump's orbit was on board. Trump Internet (think of the marginal bloggers, the conservative experts and the alt-right world that possibly helped elevate Trump) hated him. #SyriaHoax called him. This was similar to the regime change and national construction, everything they hated about the foreign policy of the last administration.

From a veterinarian to @POTUS
1.) No more regime changes
2) No more American deaths
3) No more construction of the nation
It's what he executed … #SyriaHoax

– Monitoring based on ???? (@BasedMonitored) April 6, 2017

Several Democratic and Republican interventionists in Congress also demanded that Trump approach them before to launch such an attack. (Constitutional experts mostly agree that the president has the authority for a timely attack.) In addition, despite his talk, Congress has done everything possible to avoid making difficult decisions about Syria, largely renouncing its responsibility to declare war)

The appropriate role for the United States in the seven-year conflict in Syria has been a topic of debate so intractable for so long in Washington that the tensions are extremely high. It could be said that one of the biggest landslides of the foreign policy of the Obama presidency was when he threatened military intervention for a chemical attack in Syria by drawing a "red line", and then could not comply.

When you consider that the US debate on Syria also folds into complicated geopolitical rivalries, including between the United States and Russia, and emotional images of children and babies struggling to breathe, you have the characteristics of a political pressure cooker.

Trump was found in the past year, and to some extent he is again today. Probably the president does not overlook that, for the most part, the decision to launch missiles in Syria the last time got him out of that pressure cooker and won him wide support.

Emily Guskin contributed to this report.

.

[ad_2]
Source link