Instead, Mr. Trump said in the statement that lawmakers should support immigration legislation drafted by Senator Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa, to codify his own plan. The bill would provide a path to citizenship for 1.8 million young immigrants, end the visa lottery program, build a border wall and end what he calls "chain migration," which is family immigration.
"The overwhelming majority of Americans voters support a plan that meets the four pillars of the Framework, which moves us toward the safe, modern and legal immigration system that our people deserve," Trump said.
He added that he would oppose a smaller group, "Band-aid" Approach to immigration that some lawmakers have been discussing, that would protect Dreamers for a few years in exchange for a small increase in border security spending, basically throwing the question forward.
Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the leader, responded harshly to the president's plea, noting with dismay that Mr. Trump last September ended the Obama-era program known as DACA, or deferred action for the arrival of childhood, which protected the dreamer from deportation and gave them work permits.
"The American people know what is happening," Schumer said in the Senate plenary. "They know that this president not only created the problem, but seems to be against every solution that could happen because it is not 100 percent of what he wants, if, at the end of the week, we can not find a bill that can be approved, and I sincerely hope that this is not the case due to the good efforts of so many people on both sides of the aisle, the responsibility will fall completely on the shoulders of the president and those of this body that accompanied him. "
Republicans seeking a compromise on immigration were equally perplexed.
"The president is going to vote on his concept, I do not think he gets 60 votes," said Sen. Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, adding: "The final result is: what will you do next? What we have done for the past 35 years: blaming each other, or you can start fixing the broken immigration system, if you came out of this with strong border security – the president would get his wall and the Dream Act population would be served. most Americans would applaud. "
Mr. Trump's statement was a victory for conservatives in his administration, including Stephen Miller, his chief domestic policy adviser, who has been pressuring the president to demand a review of the country's immigration rules in exchange for his support for a solution. permanent for Dreamers. 19659009] Continue reading the main story
Several senior White House aides told reporters Wednesday that Trump will not back down on his principles of hard-line immigration and said Dreamers should blame the Democrats if the legislation is not passed.
A senior adviser, who requested anonymity to discuss the legislative strategy, said the president had made "dramatic concessions" by agreeing on a path to citizenship for 1.8 million young immigrants. Another made it clear that Mr. Trump will not compromise anymore.
That position was underscored on Wednesday by a statement from the Department of Homeland Security that closed a competitive immigration measure offered by Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, and Chris Coons, Delaware Democrat.
That bipartisan bill would require more border security, but would not directly finance the construction of a border wall that Trump promised. The bill would offer a way for Dreamers to be legal; the D.H.S. the statement described it as a measure of "mass legalization."
"The McCain-Coons proposal would increase illegal immigration, increase chain migration, continue to capture and liberate and open a path to citizenship for convicted foreign criminals," the department statement said.
Major Republicans in the House and the Senate praised the administration's statements on Wednesday, describing them as a boost to the approach that many of its more conservative members support.
"The president has clarified what are the principles that should be addressed if we are going to make a law instead of simply making political points," Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, a Republican leader, said Wednesday morning.
Spokesman Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin echoed that sentiment, saying that "the president did a very good job putting a very sincere offer on the table, and that sincere offer that he put on the table should be the framework through which we meet to find a solution. "
Although the president's support for the Iowa Republican proposal is not surprising, his vague promise not to support other initiatives is remarkable, as Mr. Trump told lawmakers last month that he would sign any bill immigration that Congress sends you. Republican leaders have said that Congress should only pass laws that Mr. Trump would sign, but how flexible the president would be is a key issue for lawmakers.
The president's response to that question came when one of the bipartisan coalitions in the Senate approached an agreement that the members would consider would get 60 votes, establishing a confrontation between a large number of members of both parties and the leadership Republican, led by Mr. Trump.
Mr. Graham said there is a "growing consensus" around a two-front approach, in which the protections would extend to approximately 1.8 million undocumented immigrants who were brought as children, in exchange for the $ 25 billion for the border wall proposed by the president. He said that addressing other proposals has become "politically toxic" since a White House immigration meeting where Trump referred to African nations as "shitty countries."
When asked about Mr. Trump's veto threat, Mr. Graham said: Well then, we will not go very far. Then you will have three presidents who failed. You will have Obama, Bush and Trump. "
The White House position was announced when the Senate began the immigration debate, which allows senators to build legislation from a blank space in the Senate.
Other proposals With bipartisanship support on Capitol Hill has a narrower focus than Mr. Grassley, extending protections for young immigrants brought into the country illegally as children and reinforcing border security, but those bills do not include harsh changes to the law. the immigration law that Trump supports, and most Democrats strongly oppose it.
The declaration is likely to make the Capitol's deliberations much more difficult.The president ended an Obama-era program that protected young undocumented immigrants, known as DACA, or Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, but gave Congress six months to find r a legislative alternative. The Grassley project includes several measures to increase border security, including increased use of radar and tower surveillance, sensors and drones mostly along the southwestern border, and an increase in the number of border patrol agents. . The National Guard would also be used to help build border fences and operate some of the surveillance equipment.
Continue reading the main story