- President Donald Trump on Saturday lashed out at the US Supreme Court in his latest resentment stemming from his loss in the 2020 presidential election.
- The president reiterated his earlier complaint that he lacked legal “standing”: “the legal concept of whether a person has the right to bring a special suit.”
- Trump said he had “evidence” of widespread fraud in the 2020 election, but provided no such evidence.
- Trump and his campaign’s legal team have so far lost all efforts to reverse the election result.
- For more stories visit the Business Insider homepage.
With less than a month until he left office, President Donald Trump on Saturday refused to interfere in the 2020 election in the US Supreme Court, which Trump lost to President-Elect Joe Biden.
“The US Supreme Court has become completely incompetent and weak on the massive electoral fraud that occurred in the 2020 presidential election,” He said in a tweet Saturday before 9 am. “We have full evidence, but they don’t want to see it – there is no ‘standing’, they say. If we have corrupt elections, we have no country!”
During his tenure, Trump successfully nominated three justices to the court: Justice Neil Gorsuch in 2017, Justice Brett Kavanuagh in 2018, and most recently, Justice Amy Connie Barrett in 2020.
Trump has Previously complained About the lack of standing to bring their desired lawsuits, which is the legal concept of whether a person has the legal capacity to bring a special suit before a particular court. Trump and his campaign turned to legal challenges soon after his loss, but he and Republican officials have won at least 40 of the victories.
Moments later on Saturday, in another tweet, Trump lobbied for a subsequent attack on the sanctity of the US election, claiming that he had spoken to someone in which he said that “the election in Afghanistan is the United States 2020 There are far safer and better than elections. “
Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) 26 December 2020
Trump has made numerous, baseless accusations, ranging from widespread voter fraud to debuts by former Attorney General William Burr, by Democrats who harmed Biden in a “rig” election that would take office on January 20.
Earlier this week, as Insider’s Jacob Shamshian reported, Trump filed another direct appeal with the Supreme Court to challenge the results of the Pennsylvania election. But even in the unlikely case, the Supreme Court heard the case and overturned the lower court’s ruling against the president, Trump still would not have enough electoral college votes to sidestep Biden’s victory.
Biden won 306 electoral college votes, and even without Pennsylvania’s 20, he would still be over 270 with what was needed for a safe win. Trump earned 232 electoral college votes.
And earlier in December, the Supreme Court refused to hear a lawsuit brought by the state of Texas, which was encouraged by congressmen, as reported by NBC News. A small, without opinion, court said the state “has not judicially demonstrated a cognitive interest in the way any other state conducts its elections.”
At the center of Trump’s grievances, states have changed from red to blue in the hours and days following the election. In fact, the results moved away from Trump and Biden was followed by counting more mail-in ballots than on election night. Trump had repeatedly discouraged his supporters from putting him in a mail-in ballot, falsely alleging that he was a victim of fraud. He was encouraged by Democrats and local officials to reduce crowding at polling places during the coronovirus epidemic.