Trump backs US spy businesses after Putin meddling comment


President Donald Trump and Russia"s President Vladimir Putin talk as Vietnam's President Tran Dai Quang (R) looks on, during the family photo session at the APEC Summit in Danang, Vietnam 11 November 2017.Image copyright

Image caption

The two leaders mentioned the allegations at an Asia-Pacific summit in Vietnam

President Donald Trump seems to have rowed again on feedback suggesting he believed the Russian president’s denials of meddling within the US election.

He was extensively criticised after saying Vladimir Putin had been insulted by the allegations of Russian interference.

On Sunday, Mr Trump clarified that he supported US intelligence businesses, who’ve lengthy concluded that Russia tried to sway the 2016 ballot in his favour.

The two leaders briefly mentioned the allegations at an Asia-Pacific summit.

Questions surrounding Russia’s function in final 12 months’s US elections and allegations of collusion involving Donald Trump’s marketing campaign crew have dogged his presidency. Legal motion has already been taken towards a number of of his former aides as a part of a justice division inquiry.

Until now, President Trump has refused to acknowledge intelligence company findings that Russia was behind the hacking of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) within the run-up to the ballot.

  • Russia: The ‘cloud’ over the White House
  • Who’s who within the drama to finish all dramas?

How has Mr Trump backtracked?

After transient conversations with President Putin on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation (Apec), Mr Trump briefed reporters on Saturday on what had been mentioned about Russian interference within the presidential marketing campaign.

“Every time he sees me he says I did not do this, and I actually imagine that when he tells me that, he means it.

“I believe he’s very insulted by it, which isn’t a very good factor for our nation.”

He additionally disparaged key figures within the US intelligence group who concluded in January that Russian meddling had taken place, together with former nationwide intelligence chief James Clapper, ex-CIA director John Brennan and sacked FBI chief James Comey, whom he known as “political hacks”.

Image copyright

Image caption

Mr Trump and Mr Putin had three transient conversations over the weekend in Vietnam

Asked to make clear his feedback on Mr Putin’s denials throughout a press convention with the Vietnamese president on Sunday, Mr Trump mentioned: “As to whether I believe it or not, I’m with our agencies, especially as currently constituted.”

Drawing a transparent line between the present and former management of the FBI, CIA and nationwide intelligence he mentioned “As currently led, by fine people, I believe very much in our intelligence agencies.”

“What he believes, he believes,” he added, of Mr Putin’s perception that Russia didn’t meddle within the presidential marketing campaign.

He later took to Twitter to badault “haters and fools”, who, he mentioned, didn’t encourage good relations between Russia and the US.

Skip Twitter put up by @actualDonaldTrump

When will all of the haters and fools on the market notice that having a very good relationship with Russia is an effective factor, not a nasty factor. There at all times taking part in politics – dangerous for our nation. I need to resolve North Korea, Syria, Ukraine, terrorism, and Russia can enormously badist!

— Donald J. Trump (@actualDonaldTrump) November 12, 2017

End of Twitter put up by @actualDonaldTrump

In his tweets, Mr Trump additionally mentioned his predecessor, Barack Obama, had lacked “chemistry” with President Putin.

What was the response?

Mr Trump’s unique feedback got here underneath vehement criticism at house with lawmakers and intelligence figures questioning whether or not he had accepted the Russian president’s denials of interference, regardless of intelligence findings on the contrary.

  • Republican Senator John McCain, a strident critic of Mr Trump, known as him naive for “taking the word of a KGB colonel over that of the American intelligence community”
  • Adam Schiff, rating Democratic member of the House Intelligence Committee, tweeted: “You know who else is insulted by it, Mr President? The American people. You believe a foreign adversary over your own intelligence agencies.”
  • Mr Clapper advised Reuters: “The fact that he would take Putin at his word over the intelligence community is unconscionable.”
  • A CIA badertion handed to US media mentioned: “The intelligence badessment with regard to Russian election meddling has not changed.”

Trump out on a limb once more

Aleem Maqbool, BBC News, Da Nang

Donald Trump as soon as once more goes towards the findings of his personal intelligence businesses.

Because though the US justice division is investigating the dimensions and nature of Russian interference within the election of 2016 (and any hyperlinks to the Trump marketing campaign), the American intelligence group has already lengthy decided that Russia did, certainly, intervene.

Yet Mr Trump steered this story was not solely solely fabricated by his political opponents, it would even be costing lives in Syria, as a result of it’s getting in the best way of his relationship with the Russian president and hampering their means to badist resolve the battle collectively.

“People will die because of it, and it’s a pure hit job, and it’s artificially induced and that’s a shame,” he mentioned.

It is tough to know what the president hopes to realize with such a rhetoric. The investigation goes on.

What are the allegations towards Russia?

The CIA and different intelligence businesses have already concluded that Russia was behind the DNC hack within the run-up to final 12 months’s presidential election.

The contents of the emails, handed to Wikileaks and posted on-line, had been embarrbading to the Democrats and shook up the presidential marketing campaign, which resulted in defeat for Hillary Clinton.

In addition to the justice division inquiry, led by particular investigator Robert Mueller, congressional committees have been set as much as perform their very own investigations.

Image copyright

Image caption

The presidential marketing campaign was fiercely contested

Relations between the US and Russia have been strained for years, with the Kremlin lengthy accusing Washington of searching for to sway elections in Russia and different ex-Soviet states together with Ukraine and Georgia.

While Russian hackers are extensively suspected of involvement, there was no conclusive hyperlink to the Kremlin.

Denying that Russia had tried to intervene final 12 months by fostering contacts with Mr Trump’s marketing campaign, Mr Putin advised reporters in Vietnam: “Everything about the so-called Russian dossier in the US is a manifestation of a continuing domestic political struggle.”

  • 18 revelations from Wikileaks emails
  • Russia’s ‘cyber conflict’ towards the West

How far has US justice division investigation progressed?

Last month, former Trump marketing campaign adviser George Papadopoulos pleaded responsible to having lied to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) concerning the timing of conferences with alleged go-betweens for Russia.

He testified that Russian nationals had contacted him in an try to realize affect with the Trump marketing campaign, providing “dirt” within the type of “thousands of emails” on Mrs Clinton in April 2016 – two months earlier than the DNC emails had been leaked.

Mr Trump has performed down the significance of Mr Papadopoulos, calling him a “low-level volunteer” and “liar”.

On Saturday, Mr Putin brushed apart US media studies lady wrongly recognized by Mr Papadopoulos because the Russian president’s niece had provided to badist dealer conferences with Kremlin officers.

“I do not know anything about it and I think it is just some fantasies,” Mr Putin mentioned.

Mr Trump’s former marketing campaign supervisor, Paul Manafort, and an affiliate had been additionally positioned underneath home arrest on costs of cash laundering on account of the Mueller inquiry, however the costs don’t relate to the election.

  • What do ex-aides’ costs imply for Trump?

Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.