Nearly two weeks after the Yankees determined to let supervisor Joe Girardi stroll, nothing has emerged to make their choice appear any much less complicated than it did on the time. Some contemporary commentary on the state of affairs from normal supervisor Brian Cashman did nothing to clear it up.
Cashman baderted to native media immediately that there wasn’t any problem along with his personal relationship with Girardi, or any disconnect over using badytics. The one space he deemed an issue was “connectivity and communication” with gamers—apparently not a lot of an issue as to cease him from later calling Girardi “an exceptional manager.” In a vacuum, there’s nothing notably unusual about this; Girardi was widely known as an excellent supervisor, certain, however typically good managers have been let go over lower than qualms about connectivity and communication. What’s unusual is that this: Cashman maintains that this transformation was wanted now and that there’s somebody on the market who can present that change in a meaningfully optimistic type.
From ESPN’s write-up of Cashman’s feedback:
Cashman stated he has no timetable for naming Girardi’s successor and had no preconceived candidate or checklist of replacements when he knowledgeable Girardi of the firing.
“Whoever the lead horse will be, hopefully they will be pretty obvious and they will win by 16 lengths, like Secretariat did,” Cashman stated.
It’s potential that Cashman was being intentionally coy right here in saying that he had no substitute in thoughts when he fired Girardi. But given this yr’s area of potential candidates, it appears extra doubtless that he was telling the reality. By the time that the Yankees let go of Girardi on Oct. 26, the largest managerial names have been already off the market: the Red Sox had Alex Cora, the Mets had Mickey Callaway, the Nationals have been nearly to lock down Davey Martinez. It’s onerous to think about whom the crew may’ve checked out and thought, Yes, listed below are some definitively strong upgrades over Joe Girardi. (Uh, Brad Ausmus? Raul Ibanez? Jerry Hairston, Jr.?) And it’s a lot tougher to think about somebody coming alongside now to turn into an apparent frontrunner within the vein of Secretariat.
(This is neither right here nor there, by the best way, however Secretariat didn’t win any of his 1973 Triple Crown races by 16 lengths, and he really doesn’t seem to have ever received any race by that determine. The quantity most famously related to him is the 31 lengths by which he received the ‘73 Belmont Stakes.)
In the grand format of baseball, as historic or world as you need to make it, there are many managers higher than Girardi—like, I don’t know, Casey Stengel or Joe McCarthy. (Incidentally, each have been lifeless for greater than 25 years.) But within the particular format of who is out there and focused on managing the Yankees and alive proper now, it’s onerous to consider anybody in any respect. The crew is coming off a season wherein they exceeded expectations by going to the ALCS, and so they have a robust core of younger expertise that just about ensures an thrilling few seasons to come back. They’re in a state of affairs the place change for its personal easy sake has little to no upside and fairly just a few potential downsides. With the data publicly accessible proper now, it’s troublesome to see what the Yankees see—presumably, a candidate whose unknown qualities are alluring sufficient to be value trashing the dependable wins of Girardi’s knowns. And not simply value it by one size, however by 16.[ESPN]