Prince Elizabeth described Megan Markle as “ignorant” of her failure to understand the real reason for her refusal to use her emerald tiara.
Royal writer and historian Robert Lacey touched on Prince Harry’s iconic “What Meghan Wants” Meghan received commentary in a new book, and according to Mirror It was quoted as saying, “Unconfirmed by the palace – but not denied – we are told that the queen felt she had to say ‘no’ to Meghan’s first choice, a beautiful emerald headdress who was ‘with Russia’ Was told ‘to come. ”
“It was the code for a sensitive origin, meaning the treasure was one of those that had found its way into Windsor’s hands through ‘undefined’ to say no to dodgy channels – and an undisclosed price.” For – After the Russian Revolution. The scam was attached. ”
Lacey said, “For this reason, Panna Tierra was rarely, if ever, put on public display and it would suit neither Mahal nor Meghan, if the newspapers began to speculate that the cystrist How the princess wore Tiara and how she was murdered. ”
Still, “Unfortunately, Harry’s disregard of both history and family tradition meant that he had no understanding of this subtlety” and, as a result, all “flew in anger” by dodging his grandmother.
Lacey concludes her statement of Prince Harry’s outbreak by stating that “neither the first time, nor the final sadness.” Ultimately it was the “no” word that “” pressed a button inside him and he flew into a rage.