"We're going to be in Iowa and Wisconsin, we're starting in Wisconsin because, as you remember, there were not many campaigns in Wisconsin in 2016. With me, that changes, I'm going to … be there a lot."
If you do not get the reference, it's this: Hillary Clinton lost to Wisconsin with Donald Trump in 2016, the first Democrat to lose badger status since 1984. Clinton believed the state was in the bag and did not campaign there during The Race of the general elections. Not even once.
"If there's a place where it surprised us, it was Wisconsin, the polls showed us comfortably on, until the end." They also looked good for the Democrat running for the Senate, Russ Feingold, we had 133 employees on the field and we spent almost $ 3 million in television, but if our data (or those of any other person) had shown that we were in danger, of course we would have invested even more, "he writes. "I would have broken my schedule, which was designed based on the best information we had, and we camped there."
Failure to visit Wisconsin became, for many Democrats, a symbol of the fatal flaw of the Clinton campaign: he simply took industrial midwest for granted, and watched Trump win Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, and together with those states, White. Home.
Although some voices have emerged since the surprising loss of Clinton questioned the strategy of his campaign in the Midwest, most of the Democratic politicians, particularly those who want to be the party's presidential candidate in 2020, have avoided directly criticizing the way that the former secretary of state handled it. Bell. That reluctance is usually explained in two ways: 1) Talking about what the Democrats did wrong in the past is not a way to solve the problem of defeating Donald Trump in the future and 2) Clinton, and her husband, remain important figures within the Party Democratic Party, and crossing them is not a very good idea.
That's what makes Klobuchar's call to Clinton and the campaign he did more intriguing.
In case you think about it, and I know there are some of you out there! – that Klobuchar did not really intend to send a signal that she was a clear break with the way Clinton does things, believes that the Wisconsin presidential primary is currently scheduled for April 7, 2020. That's more two months after the first vows. It is expected that they will be thrown out in Iowa. Therefore, there is no real reason to go there so early, except as a symbolic way of showing that Klobuchar will not take the Midwest for granted, as Clinton clearly indicates.
In truth, Clinton's coup can be a kind of necessary by-product of Klobuchar's broader tone to distinguish itself from the rest of the growing field of 2020: it may not be the best-known or best-funded candidate, but I know how to win in the place that the best-known and best-funded candidate could not do it the last time.
All campaigns are fought in the middle of the spectrum of the last race, particularly when that last race was a loss. What Klobuchar did was recognize the specter in the room, made it clear that she believes that Clinton made a big mistake and promised not to repeat that mistake.
It is a clear strategy. But is it worth it?