The neo-Nazi site calls for the dismissal of the washing of anti-Semitic memes – International –

The neo-Nazi site calls for the dismissal of the washing of anti-Semitic memes – International


(Tribune News Services) – An important neo-Nazi website facing a harbadment lawsuit against a Jewish woman in Montana has asked a federal judge to dismiss her complaint, arguing that neo-Nazi memes and anti-Jewish insults are protected expression and pose "no real threat" to the Jewish people.

Whitefish, Montana, real estate agent Tanya Gersh sued Daily Stormer blogger Andrew Anglin in April after Anglin chose the woman as "storm troll" in a website post Gersh said Anglin supporters harbaded her by phone, by mail and over the internet with threatening messages and anti-Semitic slander, including a meme that shows Gersh being sprayed with a green cloud, according to a lawsuit filed by Gersh on behalf of the Southern Poverty Law Center. an anti-racist non-profit organization.

Other messages told Gersh to commit suicide, according to the lawsuit, alleging invasion of privacy, intimidation and inflicting emotional distress.

But in a motion to dismiss the lawsuit filed in federal court in Montana on Thursday, Anglin's lawyers filed a defense that argued the messages were "generally recognized anti-Semitic tropes, with no real harm reasonably interpretable," according to the filing. .

"And, even the Nazi expression, no matter the psychic damage in the Jewish residents, however, it is a protected speech," the motion says. "Therefore, there was no real threat."

Why a CEO decided to kick out Nazis (The Daily Stormer) from the Internet (YouTube / VICE News / HBO)

The case of the Southern Poverty Law Center against Anglin marks one of the most aggressive attempts to fight the flourishing white nationalist movement in the USA UU., That has obtained energy in the last years of the presidency of Donald Trump and well-known personalities of the web like Anglin.

Decades ago, the legal center launched its first efforts to use civil litigation to dismantle far-right groups, such as the Aryan nations and several chapters of the Ku Klux Klan, winning large damages against the groups in the courts, forcing them to deliver their badets and declare bankruptcy.

The group is reviving that strategy for the 21st century.

Their claim against Anglin is part of a broader, "multifaceted and multifaceted effort to undermine the strength of those people and organizations that cast hatred and prevent them from entering to a and take over the mainstream, "said David Dinielli, one of the group's leading lawyers in the case, in an interview in August at the group's headquarters in Montgomery, Alabama.

"We would love for us to get a trial that would be enough to harbad Andrew Anglin for the rest of his life and hinder his ability to re-engage in his online hatred," Dinielli said.

But one of the biggest challenges of the group has been trying to find Anglin to serve him with the lawsuit and set the gears in motion to get one of the most reclusive figures of the far right publicly to appear in a courtroom.

The process servers could not find Anglin in Ohio, where his family lives, so the group started posting notices in a local newspaper in order to comply with the legal requirements to file a notice that he was being sued .

Anglin was very aware of the demand, publishing in the Daily Stormer, one of the most popular extreme right web sites, that "this site will be turned off if we do not win this" lawsuit filed by "Jewish terrorists".

Anglin raised more than $ 150,000 for his legal defense of a newly created crowdfunding site and told the media that he now lived in Nigeria. ("You should not worry about Nigeria," Anglin wrote in an email earlier this year when The Los Angeles Times asked skeptically about the reports and refused to comment on the lawsuit)

Last month, lawyers representing Anglin, including Marc Randazza of Las Vegas, Jay M. Wolman of Hartford, Connecticut, and Mathew M. Stevenson of Missoula, Montana, began filing motions to present Anglin's legal response to the lawsuit. .

Randazza previously told the Los Angeles Times that the case of the Southern Poverty Law Center was "to censor views that displease them, instead of claiming real legal rights."

Thursday's motion to dismiss Anglin's most important defense here. He argues that Anglin's calls for a "storm troll" were protected by the First Amendment right to freedom of expression, saying that the comments were "made on a website to encourage others to express their opinions to the Plaintiff and his badociates "and" contribute more discourse to the market of ideas ".

The motion also argues that Anglin did not violate Gersh's privacy by posting his telephone number, address and social media profiles, including that of his 12-year-old son. "All the information that the defendant allegedly published about Ms. Gersh was available to the public," the motion said.

But where is Anglin? The motion did not mean and added that Southern Poverty Law Center "bears the burden of proof in establishing the domicile (of Anglin)" and that Anglin "is not a citizen of any state."

Southern Poverty Law Center said its attorneys are reviewing the presentation.

(c) 2017 Los Angeles Times, distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.