Home / Others / The Memo: How Trump changed everything

The Memo: How Trump changed everything

One year after Trump's presidency, supporters and critics agree on one thing: the United States has never seen anything like it.

To his detractors, President Trump Donald John TrumpDems turns to the Senate of the State of Wisconsin Sessions: "We should be like Canada" on how we assimilate immigrants Republican Representative: "Scrap and Scrap "Everywhere in Haiti MORE is a reckless and rude figure, out of his depth at best and, in the worst case, American Democracy at risk.

For its sponsors, the 45th President keeps his promises, especially in regard to the economy. He is staying true to himself as the last stranger to a hostile media and political establishment.

Either way, Trump is altering the face of politics.

During his campaign, Trump "hit the heart of the establishment of two parties and he totally overturned this long-held notion that the candidate with the most money prevails," presidential adviser Kellyanne Conway Kellyanne Elizabeth ConwayTrump first year in office was the year of the CNN woman Avlon: Trump built a great beautiful metaphor, that's the whole wall & # 39; Conway, Cuomo started on Twitter about the claim that & # 39; nobody & # 39; in Trump WH talks about Hillary Clinton MORE stated before The Hill. In power, he added, "in the things that matter to Americans, he has achieved powerfully."

A diametrically opposed case is the fact by Allan Lichtman, a professor at the American University who went against the grain when predicting Trump's victory in 2016. In April 2017, Lichtman published a new book, "The Case for Impeachment . "

"In general, the Trump presidency has been very dangerous for our country," Lichtman said. "One of the most important requirements of a president is to try to unite … Donald Trump seems determined to divide us He has degraded people based on their race, their religion, their nationality, their gender. most dangerous elements in the history of the United States. "

Trump's propensity to polarize is seen again and again in opinion polls. They show that Trump historically has low approval ratings with the general public, but very solid numbers with Republicans.

A new Marist survey published on Thursday indicated that 53 percent of Americans consider the first year of the president's presidency a failure, while only 40 percent see it as a success. But 87 percent of Republicans consider Trump's first year as a success, according to the poll.

As of Friday morning, Trump's job performance obtained 39.5 percent approval from the public, while 55.5 disapproved, according to the voting average of RealClearPolitics.

These figures baffle many Republicans, as do the recent election results. The brightest warning flare for the Republican Party came in Alabama, where Democrat Doug Jones won a seat in the Senate in one of the most conservative states in December, defeating Republican Roy Moore (19659016) Roy Stewart . President of MooreDNC: "Lincoln's party is officially dead" The search for the Democrats for the winning playbook & # 39; Saturday Night Live & # 39; addresses the talks on Oprah's presidential candida MORE .

But there have been other examples, including a surprise loss in a Wisconsin state election on Tuesday. In that case, the Republican candidate lost, by about 10 points, a Trump district with 17 points in 2016.

Even Republicans who broadly support the president are wondering what kind of verdict voters will issue in mid-term elections. November period.

"Partial exams will be a good report card in terms of what the electorate feels," said Brad Blakeman, who served on the White House high-ranking staff of President George W. Bush.

Blakeman praised Trump for his "frankness and frankness," but also argued that he might have "more finesse" in his approach.

Democrats are desperate to make big gains in November. If they seize the majority in the House of Representatives, which is not as difficult as going up to the Senate, they could block Trump's legislative agenda. They would also have the power, theoretically at least, to initiate impeachment proceedings.

Democratic leaders have suggested that the time is not yet ripe for impeachment, but high-profile members of the party have rained criticism of the president.

Sen Elizabeth Warren Elizabeth Ann WarrenWarren: Trump is a racist bully Poll: Oprah would surpass Warren, Harris against Trump in California Democrats will continue to reject the positive impacts of the tax reform MORE (D -Mass) has called him "racist thug". Senator Bernie Sanders Bernard (Bernie) SandersMellman: About Political Authenticity (Part 2) Former Sanders Campaign Manager: Do not wait for the email list to be shared with Adult Film Star DNC: Trump and Stormy Daniels invited me to "hang out" & # 39; MORE (I-Vt.) He has labeled him as a "pathological liar". Senator Kirsten Gillibrand Kirsten Elizabeth GillibrandTrump believes she could easily beat Sanders in the 2020 game: report Listen: EMILY's list optimistic about Dem House in & # 39; 19 Desperate Democrats should not settle for Oprah MORE [19659004] (DN.Y.), Which accused Trump of a "sexist stain" against her during a December dispute, is one of several Democrats who have called The Democrat says that his aversion to Trump is not simply a matter of huge ideological differences. They claim that Trump has vaporized important norms.

They cite their willingness to participate in bellicose language, both in person and in tweets; his foreign policy behavior (calling the North Korean leader Kim Jong-a "Little Rocket Man", for example); his fierce attacks on the media; and the investigation of accusations of collusion with Russia during the 2016 campaign.

The last problem, especially the events surrounding the dismissal of Trump from the FBI director James Comey James Brien ComeyIntel Dem criticizes the " gag order "from the White House after Bannon's Testimony & # 39; Total free-for-all & # 39; as Bannon collides with the members of Intel Mueller has quoted Bannon in the Russian investigation: MORE report in May 2017 – is explosive. Special Advisor Robert Mueller Robert Swan MuellerSasse: The United States should applaud Mueller's election to lead the Russian investigation MORE investigates whether the president hampered justice.

Whatever the Mueller verdict, some critics of Trump worry that permanent damage has been done; that the rules will not return to their place each time your time in the White House ends.

"What started as buffoonery and burlesque has gotten darker and more serious," said Harry Litman, assistant attorney general during the presidency. The Clinton administration. "The degradation of the political culture, and the penetration of the wall between politics and the White House, on the one hand, and the prosecutors and the application of the law, on the other … I worry that it will be difficult to go back from that moment . "

Such criticisms are not limited to the Democrats. Senator Jeff Flake Jeffrey (Jeff) Lane FlakeMcCain tears to Trump for attacks on the press The bipartisan group presents the bill DACA in House Flake's anti-Trump speech will make a lot of noise, but does not make much sense MORE (R-Ariz.), An increasingly strident critic of Trump, drew parallels between Trump's rhetoric against the media and the terminology employed by Soviet leader Josef Stalin.

In a previous speech in October that announced he would not seek re-election, Flake regretted a divided political culture with "personal attacks, threats against principles, liberties and institutions, flagrant disrespect for truth and decency." Few observers doubted that he was talking about Trump.

But Trump loyalists have a ready answer for figures like Flake: How are the detractors doing with the voters?

Flake's approval rating among Arizona residents last summer was only 18 percent, according to a survey. His decision not to seek a new term came against an almost certain defeat.

When Trump's critics see a president flagrantly mocking the standards, supporters revel in their transgressions, seemingly viewing them as a refusal to bow to the forces of the hated establishment.

Jenny Beth Martin, cofounder of Tea Party Patriots, said her members would give Trump an "A" rating for her performance so far. But that was not a blank check, he added.

"We are constantly watching and reminding him of what he promised to grassroots voters across the country," he said. "We want him to keep those promises, despite the pressure of the establishment."

When asked how she and her fellow activists feel about the cases in which Trump is accused of going too far in language or deeds, she replied: "The things I've heard from our supporters, often , is "We voted for someone who is not a politician, someone who wanted to do things differently."

Kellyanne Conway made a similar point in a different way, many critics of Trump, he insisted, failed to understand the appetite of the public by someone who was "a stranger but very experienced."

Those critics "still do not understand who he is and how he communicates." Very few people, including active journalists, have stopped to really learn from him, to learn his decision-making process, to understand, "he said.

On the other side of the divide, dissidents insist they understand too well, they see Trump as an aberration. They ask if the country will recover, or if it has forged a permanent change.

"It has shattered reality itself," said Lichtman, the professor at the American University. "There is no reality in Trump's world."

Donald Trump, after only one year, is already a transforming president.

The big question is whether the transformation is for good or for bad.

The Memo is a column reported by Niall Stanage, focused primarily on the presidency of Donald Trump

Source link