Home / Entertainment / The lion king review | 411MANIA

The lion king review | 411MANIA



Directed by: Jon Favreau
Written by: Jeff Nathanson
Execution time: 118 minutes
Classification of the MPAA: PG classification by sequences of violence and danger, and some thematic elements.

Donald glover – Simba
Chiwetel Ejiofor – scar
James Earl Jones – Mufasa
Beyonce Knowles-Carter – Nala
Alfre Woodard – Sarabi
John Oliver – Zazu
Seth rogen – Pumba
Billy eichner – Timon
John Kani – Rafiki
Florence Kasumba – Shenzi
Keegan-Michael Key – Kamari
Eric André РAzizi
JD McCrary – Young Simba
Shahadi Wright Joseph – young nala

From a business perspective, Walt Disney Studios remake The Lion King, one of its most iconic animated features in history, was unavoidable. Even the remake of Aladdin, starring Will Smith, has raised nearly $ 1 billion worldwide, despite its poor performance. Also, to call this new version of The Lion King A live action movie is an inappropriate name. Director Jon Favreau has pointed it out. The new movie is not a live action movie. None of this was created with any legitimate environment or cast members. To his detriment, the whole experience was created through the computer. This is a photorealistic film animated by computer, but it is not yet a live action movie.

The Lion King It is not a shot-by-shot remake, but a remake from scene to scene. There are changes, new songs and additions to eliminate the execution time, since the original movie lasted only 88 minutes. The changes in the film come out as arbitrary. They do not improve the experience much in any way or really add some kind of new and innovative achievement.

For example, Favreau probably thought it was too uncomfortable for Rafiki to be more like a shaman and walk Pride Rock with a cane, even though it is well documented that primates use tools in nature. Oddly enough, Rafiki's staff appears inexplicably much later in the film, when the production team made sure to avoid showing a CG photorealistic monkey, who is a shaman for a fictional version of the animal kingdom, using a cane for his work. If it is unrealistic for Rafiki to have a cane as a shaman, why is it more realistic for Rafiki to have it saved as the Grayskull Sword, only to remove it and use it as an arc stick experienced later in the film? Has no sense.

Another theme refers to the interpretation of Scar's new movie, "Be Prepared," which has been totally destroyed in the new movie. It is no more than a song or a musical number. Chiwetel Ejiofor is a great talent, but he almost does not sing anything of this number. He speaks in rhyme through most of it, and then it ends. And that's how most of 2019 is. Lion King feel Certainly, something of classical music is sustained. The movie has some nice real eyes and CGI magic, but it's like a lion that has been hunted, massacred, stuffed and thrown on display in a mantle in a hunter's lodge. There is no inner life or soul in this movie.

Yes, the team and the animators of Favreau managed to create some impressive and highly detailed sequences. Some of them look impressive, maybe even beautiful. But what does the $ 250 million CG imagery really mean if there is no emotional connection to the story and the characters on the screen? The great effects of CG are not great if they remove the emotional resonance of what the film tries to represent. The movie has almost no emotional resonance.

The documentaries of nature on the BBC evoke more emotions than the new ones. Lion King, which is nothing more than a shell. There is no expressiveness in the faces of the characters. They talk, but their mouths barely move. Their faces have blank expressions. Most of your body language does not even look like genuine articles. This becomes a problem when Favreau and his production team try to adapt the same scenes from the original film, but they make the animal characters move and act more like real animals, since they are supposed to look like "live action". From a visual point of view, that style does not work.

The Lion King It creates a strange strange valley effect. The animators could not really make alive and breathable characters in a story. As a result, The Lion King lose any and all sense of immersion.

As for the changes made to the film, it seems that Favreau had trouble creating a better atmosphere and lighting settings for the night scenes. Many of the scenes that previously took place in dark or nocturnal environments are brilliantly illuminated in the middle of the day. "Can You Feel The Love Tonight" takes place with Simba and Nala hanging around on a lighted day. Where is that romantic low light environment? This extends to the darker version of Pride Rock controlled by Scar. Even Scar's perversion of Simba's exuberant and vibrant homeland has lost much of its dark threat.

The vocal performances of the actors are certainly not helped by the rather unimportant attitude that is shown throughout the experience. Of course, most of the actors in this type of large animated productions do their work individually, rather than interpreting the other actors. But listening to the vocal performances of The Lion KingThis is exactly how the actors sound: as if they were alone recording their lines on the stand. Specifically, Beyonce's performance as an adult Nala has an unnatural rigidity. Your singing lines are definitely in point, but that's it. John Oliver as Zazu, Billy Eichner as Timon and Seth Rogen as Pumbaa definitely sound like they are trying to inject some humor, but it is still uncomfortable to hear their dialogue coming from photorealistic animals. It is as if they were talking but not really believing what they are saying. The effect reminds Hollywood actors that they were used to double during 2013. Walking with Dinosaurs Movie, with equally uncomfortable results.

A big part of that problem is because the physical character models have no life or visual expression. They really can not develop those reactions or "expressive" characteristics that are possible in a 2D animated version. The characters of The Lion King They are losing a significant part of their performance. What the animators did not achieve with the new version of 2019 is proof of how crucial and important were the Disney Renaissance animators for those classic and iconic films. They created a significant part of the "acting" and the physical performance of the characters. They made those flat and hand-drawn characters become icons of life, breathing and indelible. The characters were brought to life on screen in a lively way.

The characters of The Lion King It inspired and evoked as much emotion in an audience as any live performance in history. Seeing the history of the new movie, there is no emotional connection between Simba, Mufasa, Timon, Pumbaa, Scar, Nala, Rafiki and Sarabi. There is no chemistry. There is no visual poetry. As such, these characters also do not have an emotional connection with the public.

<! –

The final score: revision
Torture

The 411

Redo The Lion King Looking photorealistic was a big mistake. Favreau and his team tried to make a breakthrough. However, making the computer animated film look photorealistic while maintaining the music, scenes and dialogue of the original only serves to highlight the gap that still exists with the photorealistic CGI. Is it possible that children and families can still be involved with this? Yes. But, why watch a work of inflated cinema, without life and without soul, when the classic and iconic original is still available? Hopefully, Disney will soon run out of iconic animated films to remake, and this phase will finally reach a merciful end.

The final score: revision
Torture

The 411

Redo The Lion King Looking photorealistic was a big mistake. Favreau and his team tried to make a breakthrough. However, making the computer animated film look photorealistic while maintaining the music, scenes and dialogue of the original only serves to highlight the gap that still exists with the photorealistic CGI. Is it possible that children and families can still be involved with this? Yes. But, why watch a work of inflated cinema, without life and without soul, when the classic and iconic original is still available? Hopefully, Disney will soon run out of iconic animated films to remake, and this phase will finally reach a merciful end.

The final score: revision
Torture

The 411

Redo The Lion King Looking photorealistic was a big mistake. Favreau and his team tried to make a breakthrough. However, making the computer animated film look photorealistic while maintaining the music, scenes and dialogue of the original only serves to highlight the gap that still exists with the photorealistic CGI. Is it possible that children and families can still be involved with this? Yes. But, why watch a work of inflated cinema, without life and without soul, when the classic and iconic original is still available? Hopefully, Disney will soon run out of iconic animated films to remake, and this phase will finally reach a merciful end.

The final score: revision
Torture

The 411

Redo The Lion King Looking photorealistic was a big mistake. Favreau and his team tried to make a breakthrough. However, making the computer animated film look photorealistic while maintaining the music, scenes and dialogue of the original only serves to highlight the gap that still exists with the photorealistic CGI. Is it possible that children and families can still be involved with this? Yes. But, why watch a work of inflated cinema, without life and without soul, when the classic and iconic original is still available? Hopefully, Disney will soon run out of iconic animated films to remake, and this phase will finally reach a merciful end.

The final score: revision
Torture

The 411

Redo The Lion King Looking photorealistic was a big mistake. Favreau and his team tried to make a breakthrough. However, making the computer animated film look photorealistic while maintaining the music, scenes and dialogue of the original only serves to highlight the gap that still exists with the photorealistic CGI. Is it possible that children and families can still be involved with this? Yes. But, why watch a work of inflated cinema, without life and without soul, when the classic and iconic original is still available? Hopefully, Disney will soon run out of iconic animated films to remake, and this phase will finally reach a merciful end.

The final score: revision
Torture

The 411

Redo The Lion King Looking photorealistic was a big mistake. Favreau and his team tried to make a breakthrough. However, making the computer animated film look photorealistic while maintaining the music, scenes and dialogue of the original only serves to highlight the gap that still exists with the photorealistic CGI. Is it possible that children and families can still be involved with this? Yes. But, why watch a work of inflated cinema, without life and without soul, when the classic and iconic original is still available? Hopefully, Disney will soon run out of iconic animated films to remake, and this phase will finally reach a merciful end.

The final score: revision
Torture

The 411

Redo The Lion King Looking photorealistic was a big mistake. Favreau and his team tried to make a breakthrough. However, making the computer animated film look photorealistic while maintaining the music, scenes and dialogue of the original only serves to highlight the gap that still exists with the photorealistic CGI. Is it possible that children and families can still be involved with this? Yes. But, why watch a work of inflated cinema, without life and without soul, when the classic and iconic original is still available? Hopefully, Disney will soon run out of iconic animated films to remake, and this phase will finally reach a merciful end.

The final score: revision
Torture

The 411

Redo The Lion King Looking photorealistic was a big mistake. Favreau and his team tried to make a breakthrough. However, making the computer animated film look photorealistic while maintaining the music, scenes and dialogue of the original only serves to highlight the gap that still exists with the photorealistic CGI. Is it possible that children and families can still be involved with this? Yes. But, why watch a work of inflated cinema, without life and without soul, when the classic and iconic original is still available? Hopefully, Disney will soon run out of iconic animated films to remake, and this phase will finally reach a merciful end.

The final score: revision
Torture

The 411

Redo The Lion King Looking photorealistic was a big mistake. Favreau and his team tried to make a breakthrough. However, making the computer animated film look photorealistic while maintaining the music, scenes and dialogue of the original only serves to highlight the gap that still exists with the photorealistic CGI. Is it possible that children and families can still be involved with this? Yes. But, why watch a work of inflated cinema, without life and without soul, when the classic and iconic original is still available? Hopefully, Disney will soon run out of iconic animated films to remake, and this phase will finally reach a merciful end.

The final score: revision
Torture

The 411

Redo The Lion King Looking photorealistic was a big mistake. Favreau and his team tried to make a breakthrough. However, making the computer animated film look photorealistic while maintaining the music, scenes and dialogue of the original only serves to highlight the gap that still exists with the photorealistic CGI. Is it possible that children and families can still be involved with this? Yes. But, why watch a work of inflated cinema, without life and without soul, when the classic and iconic original is still available? Hopefully, Disney will soon run out of iconic animated films to remake, and this phase will finally reach a merciful end.

The final score: revision
Torture

The 411

Redo The Lion King Looking photorealistic was a big mistake. Favreau and his team tried to make a breakthrough. However, making the computer animated film look photorealistic while maintaining the music, scenes and dialogue of the original only serves to highlight the gap that still exists with the photorealistic CGI. Is it possible that children and families can still be involved with this? Yes. But, why watch a work of inflated cinema, without life and without soul, when the classic and iconic original is still available? Hopefully, Disney will soon run out of iconic animated films to remake, and this phase will finally reach a merciful end.

<! –

The 411: Redo The Lion King Looking photorealistic was a big mistake. Favreau and his team tried to make a breakthrough. However, making the computer animated film look photorealistic while maintaining the music, scenes and dialogue of the original only serves to highlight the gap that still exists with the photorealistic CGI. Is it possible that children and families can still be involved with this? Yes. But, why watch a work of inflated cinema, without life and without soul, when the classic and iconic original is still available? Hopefully, Disney will soon run out of iconic animated films to remake, and this phase will finally reach a merciful end.
Final score:
[ Torture ]

legend

->


Source link