‘The Glorious’ Movie Review: On Prime Video


Lorraine Toussaint and Julianne Moore in Pride.
Photo: Dan McFadden / Roadside Attractions

Pride There is a Gloria Stenham biopic which, like its subject, refuses to go the traditional route. Instead of marching a chronological straight line at the beginning of and through the experiences of Stinem, the always experimental film, directed by Julie Temer, jumps back and forth through various eras of her life, from childhood, adolescence to critical moments. Plunges for Various stages of adulthood, including Stenham’s emergence as a feminist activist in the 1970s. It is a bold cinematic approach that cannot overcome the rote nature of the script, co-adapted by Temer and playwright Sarah Ruhl from Steamer’s memoir, My life on the road, Trying to cram a lot of biographical detail into a single feature.

The plural nature of the film’s title refers to the fact that it has four glorious Pride: The girl (Ryan Kiara Armstrong), who along with the rest of her family, is choking her eccentric, travel-focused father (Timothy Hutton); Kishore (Lulu Wilson) who feels responsible for his depressed and anxious mother (Enid Graham); The young woman (Alicia Vikander) who passes through India and starts making a name for herself as a journalist; And the older woman (Julianne Moore) who met M / s. The magazine finds her voice as America’s best-known advocate for women’s rights.

In a running motif, we see all four of Glorious riding in a Greyhound bus, which remains unknown until the end of the film, sometimes talking to each other, questioning the choices he (she?) Made. ) Or Will do it. Some scenes begin with a gloria and are occurring at a completely different time with a different gloria than initially contained. At one point, Gloria of Armstrong is in the back seat of a car, crying, while pro-life protesters bang on the windows and shout at her. When the car stops and the back door opens, it’s actually Moore’s Gloria, which emerges, ready in 1978 to house a house in St. Joan of Arch Church, Minneapolis. (Yes, it caused controversy at the time.)

Toggling all between the period of time and the stineum is effective in expressing the idea that a woman can develop only if she moves once while in contact. It is also found in a top part of the film: Women have to play different roles continuously based on their desires and conflicting expectations of society. The problem is that all this movement makes it difficult to ever fully settle into the film or to feel as if we are actually spending time getting to know Stenham. Logically, the brain understands that all these Glorious are the same person, but emotionally, it is difficult to form a relationship, even though all the artists do a solid job of dwelling on it. Vikander, in particular, captures Stinem’s way of speaking, as well as the warm-heartedness he turns to other women.

There is no flaw of the film, which is now available exclusively on Prime Video, it also happens that it does not happen after a long time Mrs. America, Hulu limited series about the feminist movement of the 70s, as FX included some of the same fields Pride Does. When the film introduces us to other leaders in the pro-ERA fight, such as Fl Kennedy (played in a spirited performance by Lorraine Toussaint) and Bella Abzug (Bett Midler), and then takes us inside the historic National Women’s Conference, Some viewers may feel that they have already seen the film. They may also feel that they got more nuances on at least part of Steenum’s life, as Rose Byron and only Rose Byron felt, he was also watching the series.

Pride Steinam is treated with the utmost reverence, which is not surprising, as he had some involvement in the production. Frankly, in this case, reverence is appropriate, although it would have added more layers to the film if Taimur had given more time in view of his shortcomings. The film definitely humanizes it. We watch as Gloria wrestles with fear of public speaking, guilt over her father’s not going to the hospital before her death, and anger at herself for not forcing male editors, including the male editors in this magazine, to stand more forcefully We do. But the film never lets you forget that Gloria Stenham is an icon, especially in its finale.

There are some flights of directorial imagination that, like the film, are beautifully shot and interesting to watch, but do not add deep substance or insight to the overall story. One of those flights begins with an interview with a talk-show host who refers to Stanim as a sex object, then spirals into a series of images of Glorius in different directions – the nun, the playboy bunny , Witch – then whips the host through a tornado in Wizard of Oz-Ian thrives. In another distinctly metaphorical sidebar, reminiscent of a Talking Heads music video, Moore’s Steenum walks down a long street, as the yellow lines appear from the sidewalk wash on his face. Temer undoubtedly included these moments for a reason, but it is not immediately clear what that reason is.

A film about such a decisive figure, who fights, and still fights, must scatter some intense feelings hard for gender equality, especially if you are a woman. strange way, Pride This never happens. With a runtime of two and a half hours, it lasts very long and does not go deep enough to enter the way it should. At one point of that bus ride, Little Girl Gloria asks the other Glorius, “Are we there yet?” Girl, I thought that.

see all

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.