The first winner of F365: The Sissoko and Winks non-partnership

This combination should not work. We know that, because Tottenham has depended on it throughout the winter, but the distribution of the attributes is not correct: between Harry Winks Y Moussa Sissoko, there is no static and rebaduring ball winner, none is famous for their positional discipline and, on the whole, they do not possess the metronomic authority that is supposed to be a prerequisite in the Champions League.

Your success in the 1-0 victory over Manchester City It depended in part on Pep Guardiola, who can add another obstacle to his Champions League record. The city is still well within the draw, in fact, they should still be considered favorites to advance, but Guardiola was very obviously, and incorrectly, determined to make this a physical competition. That was the real mistake, not the decision to leave out Kevin De Bruyne or Leroy Sane. If City had not brought such a belligerent attitude to North London, exhibited by its general attitude and, above all, by the ridiculous double elbow of Fernandinho on Harry Kane, then the game would not have been so complicated.

But they did and that's how it was, and that was adapted to the imperfect midfield of the Spurs. They would have wanted a round-trip game full of bites, because all their strengths are more relevant within the transition. Winks' reputation has been defined by his technique to receive possession and his ability to break lines with his progressive step. Sissoko, clearly, is not equipped with that kind of delicacy, but he also thrives in conditions similar to those of basketball, because the more relevant is his ability to cover ground and have possession, the more effective he is ultimately. He wants – he needs – a broken field to show his best.

Conversely, if this had been a more typical performance of the City, in which they camped in the middle of their opponent for long periods, slashing those subtle pbades in the penalty area of ​​Tottenham, Sissoko and Winks would not only have been more pbadive, but the weakness they share. – Vulnerability to a sustained defensive examination – would have been a more effective objective.

This being the case, they emphasized what they do well. Tottenham, like a war, will drop the gloves and fight against anyone, and those two were the true beneficiaries of another Guardiola thought.

The winks were a great success. His temperament has always been his food ticket, particularly in this type of game. That he is not afraid of receiving the ball under pressure and deep in his own half is a tremendous force and, like Matt Stead He noted in his 16 conclusions., a common characteristic of their performances against some very strong opponents in the past.

He is a brave footballer and that also manifests in his desire to advance in the game. Winks is not reckless in possession, but he does not recycle it without a goal: a dismissal to a fullback or middle center is usually a last resort and, instead, his first instinct is to move on. It is possible that the best example of that last night was not relevant to the final score, but it provided a vivid description of what Winks's main skill really is: fourteen minutes later, Kyle Walker cut a center towards (but beyond) Sergio Agüero, only for Winks to intercept, eliminates three City players from the game with an immediate vertical pbad, and creates a counterattack opportunity for Dele Alli.

That is what he is; That is the kind of optimism that allows you to thrive in this type of game. Tottenham did not enjoy most of the possession, nor did he gain any territorial advantage, but Winks offered the threat of turning those long defense periods into something dangerous at the other end and, with Kane probably now out of the return game and the Spurs They trust In the counterattack from now on, it was and will continue to be invaluable.

And Sissoko. What a rarity is he. And that means with love. He is not a cult player, he could probably control a medicine ball badly, but during this spell in the midfield, he has sometimes exercised an unjustifiably wide influence. His literal athletic ability means that he can cover entire continents of space during games, and that was again evident.

He did not do a lot of tackles, he did not finish the game with a lot of interceptions, but he got in the way, on the heels of the City's artisans and, in general, it was a great pain. It's strange to see it, but it works. It's like that big rock that chases Indiana Jones: your opponents can hear it rumble to them and, most of the time, the night before, that was enough to create a useful feeling of foreboding.

Pochettino has always taken the penalty for this transfer, because it was completed at his request. For a long time, that criticism was also valid, because the lack of an adequate and permanent position magnified the faults of Sissoko, making him an obvious villain. Now, you are being asked to play a role that is within your skill set: you can chase the game, you can win the ball and, when necessary, your straight-line career in possession offers the Spurs a gear change. priceless Remember the season of Tottenham and you will be surprised: the root of a couple of its most important objectives has been one of the waves of Sissoko.

Together, he and Winks do not really belong. As if to make that point, they did not really give him a platform by his side against City. They were not an adequate axis, they did not really hunt as a couple and, actually, as a Venn Diagram, they existed as two separate circles. But what they provided was a particular energy that, enabled by another psychosis of Guardiola in the Champions League, gave instructions of a victory that Tottenham deserved thoroughly.

Seb Stafford-Bloor

Source link