The detailed findings in a letter to college lawyers on Thursday marked the latest action by the Trump administration aimed at removing discrimination in the college application process, following complaints from students about the process at some Ivy League colleges. The Department of Justice had previously filed court papersWhich made similar allegations against Harvard University.
The Justice Department said the two-year investigation concluded that Yale rejects the scores of Asian American and white applicants each year based on their race, which they would otherwise accept. The investigation stems from a 2016 complaint against Yale, Brown and Dartmouth.
“Yale’s race discrimination specifically imposes unfair and unlawful penalties on racially-recognized applicants, including Asian American and White applicants,” said Eric Driband, assistant attorney general for the department’s Department of Civil Rights.
Prosecutors found that Yale is discriminating against applicants to its graduate program based on its race and national origin and that “race is the determinant factor in hundreds of admissions decisions each year.” The Justice Department said the investigation concluded that Asian American and white students had only one-quarter to one-quarter as likely to be admitted as African American applicants.
Driband said in a statement, “Promotes stereotypes, bitterness and division by dividing Americans into racial and ethnic spots.” “It is a past for American institutions to recognize that all people should be treated with decency and respect and without ignorance about the color of their skin.”
The investigation also found that Yale uses race as a factor in many stages of the admission process and that Yale “racially balances her classes.”
The Supreme Court has ruled that colleges and universities can consider race in admissions decisions, but has said that this should be done in a narrow way to promote diversity and be limited in time. The schools also bear the burden of demonstrating why their view of race is appropriate.
In a statement, Yale said it “categorically denies the allegation,” having fully cooperated in the investigation and is “constantly diverting substantial amounts of information and data.”
“Given our commitment to compliance with federal law, we are disappointed that the DOJ has determined this before allowing Yale to provide all the information sought by the department,” the university said in a statement. “If the department is fully informed and weighed this information, it leads to the conclusion that Yale’s practices are an example of the Supreme Court’s many decades of compliance.”
The university said it considers a multitude of factors and “looks at the whole person when deciding which of the many thousands of qualified applicants to accept.”
“We are proud of Yale’s entry practices, and we will not replace them on the basis of such qualification, hasty accusations,” the statement said.
The Department of Justice has demanded that Yale be shut down immediately and agree not to use race or national origin for upcoming admissions. The government also says that if Yale proposed that it continue to use race or national origin as a factor in future admissions cycles, the college would first have to submit a plan to the Department of Justice to “demonstrate its proposal.” Is necessarily consistent with the law. By identifying a date for the end of race discrimination. ”
The Justice Department has previously raised similar concerns about Harvard University, with prosecutors alleging “unilateral racial balance”, in a lawsuit that siding with Asian American students alleged the Ivy League school Discriminated against.
A federal judge in 2019The ruling has been appealed and arguments are set for next month to discriminate against Asian American applicants in a ruling that was seen as a major victory for supporters of affirmative action in college admissions across the US.
In the Harvard case, the Department of Justice had argued that the university went too far in its use of race, but judges disagreed. Although the Supreme Court has ruled that the use of colleges’ races in admissions must be “narrowly consistent” and may only be a “plus factor”, previous rules still consider colleges to consider a wide range of colleges. Provide latitude with race, as they build their classes.