The study, a Chinese virologist who fled Hong Kong this year, claims that “laboratory manipulation is part of the history of SARS-CoV-2.” Its findings were quickly raised by some leading news organizations New york post, Which sees “explosive” allegations running counter to almost all current scientific literature on the source of the virus.
The study is the work of the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation, sister non-profit organizations that were instrumental in creating. According to documents posted on the Society’s website last year, he served as the chair of that group. The Bannon connection was first noticed by Carl Bergstrom, a professor of biology at the University of Washington, who Called study “Bizarre and unfounded.”
Google Scholar’s search and rules of the Society’s Law and Law Foundation websites indicate that organizations have not previously published scientific or medical research, and it is unclear whether the paper received any peer review. It was posted on the website Zenodo, a publicly available repository of scientific and educational research, on Monday, which anyone can upload their work.
Both of the studies were co-created with the nonprofit exiled Chinese billionaire Guo Wengui, with whom Bannon has collaborated on a number of advocacy efforts targeting the Chinese government and business efforts that have screened federal law enforcement officials.In addition to their work on the rule of nonprofits, Bannon and Guo have also collaborated on a news website, Zee News, which suggested that the coronovirus was manufactured by the Chinese military.
In July, Bannon appeared to tease forthcoming scientific studies, supporting his contention that coronavirus originated in a laboratory in Wuhan, China. he told Daily mail Lab scientists had “defected” to the US and were cooperating with US intelligence agencies. On the “War Room: Pandemic” podcast, Bannon has hosted others who have speculated that the virus may be a Chinese “biowapon”, but has said that he believes the most laudable explanation is that This was derived from the experiments that were going on in that Wuhan lab.
This is a line echoed by some prominent US officials. President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo have both noted intelligence reports supporting that theory. “This evidence is circumstantial, to be sure,” Sen. Cotton (R-AR) wrote to Sen in an April column. Wall Street Journal, “But it points to Wuhan Laboratories.”
While an accidental leak from the Virology Lab in Wuhan remains a theoretical potential source of the initial outbreak in the city, the vast majority of scientific literature on the virus has determined that its origin was natural, and that the laboratory was not manufactured. The Trump administration’s coronovirus point-man Drs. Anthony Fauci has repeatedly emphasized that all evidence indicates that the virus was not man-made.
The study published by Bannon’s group on Monday is therefore particularly fiery. “This virus is not by nature,” one of the scientists studying during an appearance on Monday in a British talk show, Dr. Li-Meng Yan announced. She reports that the virus originates from “a smoke screen” in a Wuhan meat market that obscures its true origins.
But other virologists do not agree and say that the paper makes false claims about many basic facts. “Basically, it’s all circumstantial and some of it is completely fictitious,” said Dr., a virologist at Columbia University. Angela Rasmussen told the study’s Daily Daily.
The paper proceeds with a claim that the genes of coronoviruses are “similarly suspicious of bat coronoviruses discovered by military laboratories in China” – says a vigorous Rasmussen, which should not be surprising because “they are related to SARS-like coronaviruses” Huh. ”
The study’s authors have made similar claims about a portion of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein – which viruses use to break down and infect cells – and wrote that it is “suspiciously” the original SARS. Is similar to the virus and suggests genetic manipulation. “SARS-CoV has also used ACE2 as a cellular receptor,” says Rasmussen. “It is not doubtful and indeed expected that receptor binding domains that bind the same protein would be identical.”
Rasmussen also stated that the paper misrepresented the basic facts about another part of the coronovirus spike protein, known as the furin cleavage site. The authors claim that the cleavage site of SARS-CoV-2 is “unique” and unseen elsewhere in nature. But according to Rasmussen, “Furine cleavage sites occur naturally in many other beta-COVs, including MERS-CoV and other SARSs such as bat coronaviruses.”
Yan has said that she had run away from China over her accusations to avoid reprimanding the government there, stating that it was not giving further details about the origin and nature of the virus. She said she warned authorities in December that the virus was highly transmitted among humans but her charges were ignored.
The University of Hong Kong’s School of Public Health, where Yan was employed, disputed her allegations that the university failed to heed her warning before spreading to China.
In August, Yan appeared on Bannon’s podcast. During that show, Bannon stated that he is “still not in camp who believes they intentionally let it out but I have been firmly in the camp from the start that it originated from the Wuhan P4 Lab. ”
Concerning his work with the rule of rule groups, Bannon is also Is facing felony charges Federal prosecutors say there was an effort to extract millions of dollars from a nonprofit seeking private finances for the construction of a wall on the border of South America. Bannon pleaded not guilty to the charges.