Scientists of Glitter cause the prohibition of the threat of the environment –

Scientists of Glitter cause the prohibition of the threat of the environment


An Australian conservation group echoes calls from scientists to ban the brightness amid fears that microplastics will devastate marine life and harm humans.

The Foundation for the Executive Director of National Parks and Wildlife, Ian Darbyshire, said that Australia should follow the example of the US preschool companies. UU And UK and stop using gloss and microspheres.

"The problem is going home using glitter or micro beads in makeup." He said about those hard, small plastic balls found in toilet products that end up in the drain.

"The lavas and go directly from the shower to the ocean".

Tops Day Nurseries banned the use of gloss earlier this year on environmental concerns. Source: AAP

Mr. Darbyshire explained that plankton eat the microplastics that are then consumed without being digested by larger and larger fish, "including whales".

"They make their way into the food chain because fish and other animals can not break them down," he said.

"Then we are eating the fish and we can not break it down either." It's kind of scary. "

Microplastics are defined as plastics less than 5mm in length and are found in facial scrubs and bodywashes, listed as polyethylene, polypropylene or similar names in the ingredients.

The dazzling handcrafted product It is also a microplastic and this week the New Zealand scientist Dr. Trisia Farrelly declared "all brightness should be prohibited".

"All brightness should be prohibited because it is microplastic and all microplastics are filtered into the environment," said Dr. Farrelly, environmental anthropologist at Mbadey University, National Geographic

Last month Tops Day Nurseries in the south of England stopped using glitter, Lush, a cosmetics company, has dazzled with its products due to the environmental impact and has resorted to to the ground almond as a substitute for microadhesas.

As of July of this year, the manufacture and sale of all the lava cosmetics bles with microbeads were banned in the USA. UU , following in the footsteps of California and Illinois.

But Darbyshire says that Australia had to do the same and ban the manufacture of microplastics, including brightness.

"Brightness is a microplastic," he said. "It's causing a lot of problems."

In August, a spokesperson for the Department of Environment and Energy told the consumer group Choice 80% of the companies that had products containing microbeads had been removed.

Scientists warn about the effects that brightness can have on the ocean. File pic. Source: AAP

Add "if the current industry-driven approach does not phase out microparticles by mid-2018, governments will move to implement a ban."

A study by Professor Richard Thompson of the University of Plymouth College of Science and Engineering stated that plastics were found in one third of all fish caught in Britain.

"I was quite worried when someone bought my daughters a shower gel with glitter particles," said Professor Thompson. .

"That is going to escape down the drain and potentially enter the environment."

But Mr. Darbyshire said that in addition to banning micro-plastics, more needs to be done to protect our oceans.

"First of all, we need to stop using plastic bags: they become microplastics because of the breakdown of UV rays and waves," he said.

"Microplastics can be a by-product of what has already been thrown into the ocean."

"Secondly, we all need abe coming out and cleaning our oceans."

A humpback whale swims in the Pacific Ocean. Scientists say that the plankton they eat devours microplastics File pic Source: AAP

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.