The CDC’s Sickness and Mortality Weekly Report is developed by scientists in the department to inform medical authorities and the general public about the prevalence of COVID-19 and those who are most at risk. According to a Saturday report by Politico, the CDC has increasingly agreed to allow politically appointed officials to review the mortality weekly report and in some cases change the wording in the documents.
USA Today reported on Sunday that scientists and physicians are calling the report “Augusta,” “despicable” and “abusive”.
Dr. William Scheffner, who is on the editorial board of the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, told USA Today that he “agreed” and “acclaimed” the efforts he made to mediate with the report, calling on doctors and health care providers Provide important updates. During the epidemic.
“It is outright egoistic. This is nuanced, “Dr. Eric Topol, a professor of molecular medicine at the Scripps Research Institute, told USA Today. What we are seeing are many actors, important people who are just getting late, who are anti-science. The Trump administration. The creation of. ”
Others described the edits as an important, scientific report as a “fundamental foundation of faith,” and “horrifying.”
Global health researcher Drs. Sherry Butcher wrote on Twitter, “There are no words to explain how horrific this is.” Trust and reliability were shattered overnight. The MMWR has long been one of the most reliable, stable, scientific resources; Undisputed veracity, impeccable reputation for data / analysis quality. not anymore.”
When asked by Politico, which first reported the issue, why HHS was seeking changes, top HHS spokesman Michael Caputo said in a statement that the department was reviewing the CDC’s reports appropriately.
“Our aim is to ensure that the evidence, science-based data drive policy through this epidemic – is not the intent of the state to vomit deep into the CDC’s bowels,” he told POLITICO.