Ralph Fiennes “doesn’t understand” anger at JK Rowling

Illustration for the article titled Voldemort & quot;  I can't understand & quot;  what JK Rowling did to make us so mad

Photo: Dave M. Benett (fake images)

In a move that we can only assume will soon serve as the genesis of a new best-selling fantasy franchise.Hagrid And Voldemort and no one else does anything Magician shitPerhaps Ralph Fiennes has opted out of the “Nothing!” he might have said, and instead expressed his sincere confusion as to why people are being so mean to his old friend JK Rowling. In an interview that the actor gave to The Telegraph this week, Fiennes, who played He-who-might-have-just-shut up in all the last Harry Potter movies – stated that “I can’t understand the vitriol directed at her. I can understand the heat of an argument, but I find this time of accusation and the need to condemn irrational. I find the level of hatred people express about opinions that differ from their own and the violence of language towards others disturbing. “

And really: if Ralph Fiennes is horrified by violence, verbal or otherwise, you really should check out the things people say and do to trans people, especially when prompted by the transphobic bullshit spread by people like Rowling. whose comments during the last year They’ve been beating a constant drum claiming that trans women are not women, that trans men are not men, and that being trans is, like, kind of a very complicated ploy to gain access to women’s restrooms. Such doubling and tripling of these ideas has led to a large number of people associated with the franchise, including Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Y Rupert grint—Make clear statements that transphobia is reprehensible and that believing people when they tell you who they are is key to treating people properly in this world.

Fiennes did not go into more detail on the matter, moving on to complaints about plays that people no longer let him do, and talking about the eventual release of There is no time to die. ByouFrom her comments, it is clear that she sees the issues surrounding Rowling as a matter of decorum and speech rather than, say, human rights, that is, “There is no reason to be mean to someone just because they are questioning their humanity. or identity, as long as they do it politely. ” However, this is good news for Rowling, who he kept the Death Eater vote once again. Hurrah!


Source link