Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejects Republican bid to reject 2.5m mail-in votes US Election 2020

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has rejected a lower court order prohibiting the state from certifying dozens of contests from the November 3 election.

In the latest Republican lawsuit that attempted to thwart the victory of President-elect Joe Biden on the battlefield, the state supreme court unanimously threw out the three-day-old order, stating that the underlying lawsuit was filed that law Challenges for the Year of Pennsylvania Allows Mail-in Voting Law.

The Justice also commented on the staggering demand of the trial that an entire election be overtaken. Justice David Veitch wrote with a concurrence, “They have failed to allege that a single mail-in ballot was fraudulently inserted or counted.”

The state’s Attorney General, Democrat Josh Shapiro, called the court’s decision “another victory for democracy”.

The week-old lawsuit, led by Pennsylvania Republican Congressional President Mike Kelly, called the state’s mail-in voting law unconstitutional.

As a measure, Kelly and other Republican litigants had sought to exclude 2.5m mail-in ballots submitted under the law – most of them by Democrats – or to erase election results and the state’s Republicans- Directed to elect the controlling legislature. Pennsylvania presidential election.

The request by state lawmakers to elect Pennsylvania presidential elections is also in accordance with nearly a century-old state law that empowers electors to elect the state’s popular vote, Weich wrote.

While two Republicans from the High Court joined five Democrats to oppose those measures, they split from Democrats to suggest that the lawsuit’s underlying claims – that the state’s mail-in voting law could violate the Constitution – Are worth considering.

On Wednesday, Commonwealth Court Judge Patricia McCullough, elected as a Republican in 2009, explicitly issued an order prohibiting the certification of any remaining contests, including a contest for Congress.

A day earlier, Democratic Governor Tom Wolf said he had certified Joe Biden as the winner of the presidential election in Pennsylvania. In Pennsylvania, Biden defeated President Donald Trump by more than 80,000 votes, a state Trump won in 2016.

Wolf appealed McCullum’s decision to the state’s highest court, saying there was no “reasonable justification” for it.

The defeat followed Friday’s decision by a federal appeals court to dismiss a separate challenge to the Pennsylvania result on Friday and return it to a district judge who compared the president’s evidence-free and error-free trial ” Frankenstein’s monster “.

A three-member federal panel unanimously confirmed the lower court’s decision last week to dismiss arguments made by Trump’s legal team led by former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, that voting in Pennsylvania was concluded by widespread fraud.

“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. The allegations of improper are serious. But calling the election unfair does not happen. Charges require specific charges and then evidence. We have neither here, ”Judge Stephanos Bibas wrote for the Third US Circuit Court of Appeals.

The judge denounced it as “breathtaking”, requesting reverse certification of a Republican vote: “Voters, not lawyers, choose the president. Ballots, not briefs, decide elections. [The] The campaign claims to have no merit. “

The ruling, which was the Trump team’s 38th court defeat in nationwide election lawsuits, reaffirmed US District Judge Matthew Bran’s first view of Giuliani’s complaint, having heard a five-hour oral debate last week. The lawsuit, Bran said, “carelessly stitched together … like Frankenstein’s monster.”

With Associated Press

Leave a Reply