FCC President Ajit Pai lashed out at service providers on Tuesday (November 28) in a speech in which he defended the deregulation of ISPs.
Pai said at a Future of Internet Freedom conference in Washington that extreme providers such as Twitter are a greater threat to the Internet than Internet service providers, who were attacked as the guardians of their Democratic predecessor, Tom Wheeler. He said edge providers "routinely block and discriminate" and that the government should not support their efforts to dominate the Internet.
In a speech in which he defended his order to delay Title II, Pai said that some Silicon Valley players criticizing the plan – in particular, he pointed to Twitter – as a threat to the open internet, consumer choice and the Liberty of expression.
Pai responded that it was Twitter that discriminated based on the content, and the top players in general who were the ones who discriminated based on the point of view.
"Now look: I love Twitter, and I use it all the time," Pai said. "But let's not fool ourselves: when it comes to an open Internet, Twitter is part of the problem, the company has a point of view and uses that point of view to discriminate."
"As one of many examples, it makes Two months ago, Twitter blocked Representative Marsha Blackburn [the Republican chair of the House Communications subcommittee who helped overturn FCC broadband privacy rules] to announce her launch video of the Senate campaign because it presented a pro-life message. Prior to that, during the call [net neutrality] Action Day, Twitter warned users that a link to a company statement on the subject of Internet regulation "may be unsafe". And, to say the least, the company seems to have a double standard when it comes to suspending or voiding the accounts of conservative users compared to those of liberal users. This behavior is many things, but it is not fighting for an open Internet. "
Pai said he called others for similar actions, saying that Twitter was not an outlier.
" [D] despite everything When they talk about the fear that broadband providers can decide what Internet content consumers can see, recent experience shows that the supposed suppliers are actually deciding what content they see. These providers routinely block or discriminate the content they do not like. "
He used as examples an application store that bans applications of cigar aficionados as tobacco promotion or broadcast services that restrict videos of conservative commentator Dennis Prager's type on topics he considers important to him. Understand American values & # 39; ".  Pai pointed to the algorithms to decide what content web users see or do not see, but it is not disclosed. Then there were the "online platforms that secretly edited the comments of certain users". And, of course, American companies that bow to the repressive demands of foreign governments to block certain speech behaviors that would be repugnant to freedom of expression if it occurred within our borders. "
He said that for all those reasons the edge was a major threat to the open network of broadband providers, particularly when it comes to discrimination of views. "That could explain why the CEO of a company called Cloudflare recently questioned whether" it is the right place for the technology companies regulate the Internet. " He did not offer a solution, but remarked that "what I know is not the right answer is that a group of ten technology executives with names like Matthew, Mark, Jack, … Jeff is the one who chooses what content goes into line and what content does not connect online. "
He said that Silicon Valley may be hiding its defense in the public interest, but that it was in their interests that they were interested, which meant" using the regulatory process to consolidate their domain in the Internet economy. "