For those who are not familiar with Afrikaans, it roughly translates as "beautiful on the surface, (but) s *** below."
Who would have thought that the supposed state of Cape Town as the "best" city to run in South Africa "has been so exaggerated (and that's saying it mildly)?
Like many other cities and municipalities in the country, Cape Town, it seems, has officials who are capable, among others, of mismanagement, nepotism and corruption.
Who would have thought that the executive mayor of the city, Patricia de Lille? Aunt Patty to his most precious followers, would he be trapped in the center of these accusations, and that the members of his own party, the prosecutor, would do so, howling for his blood?
It would not be an exaggeration to say that not too long ago. Lille was considered a global figure, with Harvard economics professor Edward Glaeser describing it as one of the "best mayors of the world." "Anyone who is interested in the future of African cities can learn from it. Mayor de Lille's wisdom, "he said.
And in a lullaby and a kiss to See from City Hall – Reflections on governing Cape Town, a book written by De Lille and his now sworn enemy, Craig Kesson, former mayor of the city of New York Michael Bloomberg wrote: "A valuable guide on how, with a motivated and dynamic leadership, cities can lead the most important issues."
If you have to believe the mayor's critics, the stories of your wonderful leadership skills have been a lie.
What the city has, they say, is a mayor who is too friendly (and choose his words carefully) with property developers. They accuse her of being rude and autocratic.
On Sunday, while attending a service at World Harvest Christian Church in Langa, where the congregation prayed to remain mayor, De Lille's hard "bring-it-on" Mask, slipped slightly: wept
Perhaps it was because the severity of the battle he faced was beginning to dawn on her.
Three investigations in De Lille and the city, one led by the prosecutor's rules.Guru, John Steenhuisen, has identified and confirmed problems so serious that the consensus is that she is irrevocably committed and, therefore, must resign or be expelled.
She is not, of course, the type of person who walks sadly at sunset She has indicated that she will defend herself robustly, and that if she does not receive a fair hearing, she will go to court to present her case.
In many ways, however, De Lille, like Helen Zille, has become a " Person of yesterday "in the DA project for 2019 and beyond. When she and her Independent Democrats joined the DA in 2010, she was seen as the person to take the color vote to the still too-white Zille party.
The prosecutor has been prepared to act ruthlessly once he has achieved certain objectives. With the colored vote sealed and delivered safely, it is the African vote that has now become important. The infighting in the City of Cape Town has given the party its confidence: a heavenly opportunity to divert De Lille and bring in an African mayor, who will obviously say whatever is necessary to dispel the fears of his traditional support . 19659002] It will be risky, but it should not be forgotten that DA researchers are normally successful.
The first step will be to destroy De Lille.
Some of the accusations addressed to her revolve around nepotism and the hiring of friends in positions in the city. She is also accused of interfering with the work of the selection panel when the municipal administrator Achmat Ebrahim again applied for her position.
This, of course, is nothing new. It is known that politicians manipulate jobs and job selection processes. A few years ago, Western Cape Premier Helen Zille "banished" an office manager in one of the key departments of the Western Cape government for more than three years of what was left in her contract because she had worked for the previous ANC regime . [19659002BajolavigilanciadeDeLilletaalsohavecrisiscorruptionconcussionsconcerningtheadministrationoftheMyCitibuscountrycompanyalthoughithasnotbeencorruptedbythishasbeenencounteredoffenderinfunctionalpersonindisaster
De Lille's management style has become a key issue in the debate that has unfolded about his position.
And it's not just DA councilors who are not happy with their behavior. Organizations outside of City Hall, which would normally have interacted closely with the city are also furious.
"It's autocratic," said Len Swimmer, vice president of the Greater Cape Town Civic Alliance, which represents more than 360 organizations in the city. and in less prosperous areas.
"She does not listen to anyone, she makes her own decisions, she has a very centralized administration and she has control."
Swimmer says he is not a person who should be in front of a subway in a democratic South Africa.
"De Lille is a law in itself, she refuses to listen to anyone, she makes all the rules and has emasculated all the checks and balances that once existed in the city."
Swimmer accused her of driving the citizens of Cape Town into a massive abyss.
He accused De Lille of ignoring helping Israel donate to Cape Town to solve its water crisis. He said that Israel was the world leader in processes of desalination, but De Lille preferred to cut his nose to clear in this regard.
The farmer and social activist of the horticultural area of Philippi Nazeer Sonday also had meetings with De Lille.
He described it as a "sum of many parts," and acknowledged that it would be impossible for her to be "all for all."
"As members of the disadvantaged people of Cape Town, we are disappointed by the way she has addressed our problems.
" Our concerns are focused on deep-seated democratic issues. When we started the civic organization in 2008, we structured it in such a way that our members consisted of farmers, agricultural workers and informal settlements.
We work for the provision of services. We did the democratic thing. We try to do everything for the book.
"Now, we are gatvol of democracy.
" They told us that there was going to be a new era.
"But this has not been the case for us, we can not continue with this s ***. We went to see De Lille in 2012 to talk about the problems of service delivery in our area."
Sonday said he acted as a "patriarch". De Lille's attitude towards those with a history of Struggle who were willing to work with her raised a series of questions for Sonday and others.
In many ways, they were stunned by the way she saw the world.
For them, the fact that she came from a wrestling environment like them suggested that she would see things from the point of view of the poor.
Her views on corruption, even though her nickname as "fighter against corruption" was self-styled, also led to trust among those previously and still at a disadvantage that she would "do the right thing".
But when he approached him, he refused to listen.
Sonday said: "We went to her with a plan to improve the lives of people in our area, but she kicked us in. Later, she told a newspaper that our Powerpoint presentation was an idea to make money from the This will come up in a court case later this year.
"We believe she is too involved with real estate developers.
"Part of our case will focus on the fact that De Lille's management style has focused on the elimination of due process."
He accused De Lille of becoming judge and jury of all court proceedings. planning in Cape Town. "At De Lille, the only way to effectively register our objections is to go to court. But for this we need money. We had to raise R500000 to go to court.
In the introduction to View from City Hall, De Lille and Kesson wrote: "The city of Cape Town has achieved many successes in government during the last decade, and much of the reason for that success has to do with the quality of leadership during politically turbulent times.
Everything sounds pretty empty now.
Dougie Oakes is the editor of functions and editor of Independent Media.