MLBPA likely to reject proposal for delay in beginning of season –

MLBPA likely to reject proposal for delay in beginning of season

Earlier on Sunday, the MLB allegedly proposed to the MLBPA to delay the start of spring training and offer the season for a month, allowing for a 154-game season, and giving players a full 162-game salary. was granted.

According to a follow-up article Athletic Written by Ken Rosenthal and Ivan Dreilich, there is reason to believe that the players will reject the league’s offer on Monday. If that happens, there is a possibility that spring training will begin on time in mid-February, with the Mets’ regular season starting April 1.

Several reasons are cited as to why players do not find the offer acceptable. Among them are the following:

There is no guarantee that all 154 games will actually be played, as the season will be narrower (though it will be two weeks longer than originally planned). If the games are postponed due to any reason, it will be difficult to make them. The commissioner may have the authority to postpone the canceled game, which may affect the offer to pay the full player’s salary. There is no real guarantee of full salary in the offer.

Players feel that delays may affect their specific training regimen, and set the stage for injuries during the season.

Universal DH is a bargaining chip, and a point of contention between the two parties. The league is set to offer a universal DH (which may result in some high-paying roles for players Marcel Oguna And Nelson cruise) In exchange for extended playoffs. The MLBPA is not in favor of an extended playoff, as it is feared that the format will be a disinfect for teams to spend on players, as more teams will qualify for the postseason. The league is offering $ 80 million to the player pool for the extended playoffs (the league put $ 50 million into the pool in the 2020 short season), the same amount as the 2019 season, in the last full season. It was played with fans.

And then the biggest issue of all is the termination of the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) after the 2021 season, and the need for a comprehensive negotiation before the 2022 season. Players may now be reluctant to agree to an extended playoff (seemingly the major issue for owners), and may prefer to hold that high-priced chip for use when parties discuss the new CBA Sit for Players seek measures to increase overall competition in the next CBA, such as a reverse luxury tax that will effectively serve as the required floor on the team payroll.

If you’ve been a baseball fan for a while, then you know that the sides don’t trust each other. As Rosenthal and Drelich state, players have a fear that commissioner Rob Manfred will be free to cancel the game if conditions (COVID) are considered unsafe, impose double headers, and otherwise implement measures that Will impact players salary and service time. .

If players decline the MLB offer, the time before the expected start of spring training is short, it is unlikely that a new offer affecting the start of the camps can be made. The DH case could be agreed upon before the start of the season, as the playoffs could extend (the latter was agreed to be very close to the start of the 2020 season).

It is almost unforgivable that we are 17 days away from pitchers and catchers, and there is still doubt about the reporting date, and the rules under which the season will be played.

Since the 1970s again, after labor issues that have seen baseball’s landscape, perhaps this is not such a big surprise.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.