Mike Mitchell of Steelers calls other NFL players for the current CBA


The NFL's disciplinary process for players often seems to lack meaning or reason. This week the league gave suspensions of a game to both Rob Gronkowski and JuJu Smith-Schuster, even though Gronkowski's hit on Tre & # 39; Davious White was after the whistle and arguably deserved a more severe punishment.

Steelers safety Mike Mitchell blames this directly on his NFL teammates who voted to approve the current CBA.

"We have to do better as players when we sign the next CBA," Mitchell said. "We have to get better leadership like who runs the league."

Mitchell said the CBA his peers voted to approve in 2011 gives Roger Goodell and the league too much power without control over fines and suspensions.

My real complaint is not with @nfl is with my fellow players. How do we agree with this cba? There is no consistency in the way we are disciplined. One week you can commit a fault and be fined the next one suspended. One week a fight is an expulsion and the next is a suspension.

– Mike Mitchell (@iammikemitchell) December 5, 2017

It really comes down to how you feel at that moment and that's not the case. t right. That's not really a fair process, we're going to do better next time. Save your.

– Mike Mitchell (@iammikemitchell) December 5, 2017

Mitchell questioned, as many did, why the NFL would give suspensions of a game to Patriots tight end Rob Gronkowski and receiver the JuJu Smith-Schuster Steelers.

Gronkowski dropped an elbow on the back of Tre & White's head when White lay on the floor after the whistle in Sunday's Patriots-Bills showdown. Smith-Schuster placed a block with a helmet-to-helmet contact on Bengals linebacker Vontaze Burfict. Smith-Schuster was also singled out for standing on Burfict and mocking him after the play.

Both White and Burfict suffered a concussion. Each one had to be transported out of the field. And Gronkowski and Smith-Schuster deserved to face the consequences of breaking the rules of the league in contact with defenseless players.

But there is an important distinction here: Gronkowski's cheap shot in white was after the whistle. The blockade of Smith-Schuster in Burfict occurred during a play. And the NFL said Wednesday that they did not consider Burfict's post-game taunt as a factor in his discipline, according to Will Graves of the AP .

The current CBA grants the power of the league to give these two players the same phrase exactly because they feel like it. And almost every team in the league voted to approve it.

Retired safety Ryan Clark, who played with Mitchell at Pittsburgh from 2009 to 2013, offered an important reminder.

That's right. The Steelers were the only team in the NFL that voted against ratifying the current CBA in 2011.

Former Steelers reserve quarterback Charlie Batch told Pittsburgh Post-Gazette in 2015 that the players voted against the CBA because they were concerned about the scope of the personal conduct policy.

"That's what we would always say, the players of that Steelers team that voted 'no' were players who could talk about CBA without being hypocrites," Batch said.

The current representative of the Steelers in the NFLPA, left guard Ramon Foster, said that if players want to see changes in Goodell's power over player discipline, they will have to be willing to sacrifice themselves with an attack of players.

"You hit them in your pocket," Foster said in August, through Jacob Klinger of Penn Live. "You hit them in your pocket and that way money always talks."

As it stands now, the NFL has the authority to dictate discipline for anything Goodell decides is "conduct detrimental to the league."

If the players want me to change with the next CBA, they will have to prepare to lose some games.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.