“You are not getting it as a result of there’s not even palpable advantage,” stated Partitions, ruling from the bench and scolding the protection attorneys for what he referred to as “foolish” arguments.
The transfer means neither defendant will testify. The case may go to the jury later this week.
Protection attorneys cited a lot of evidentiary rulings and feedback from the choose that they consider have prejudiced the protection.
“The courtroom’s rulings have been unfairly prejudicial, inconsistent, and opposite to legislation,” attorneys wrote. “Defendants search a mistrial as a result of the courtroom’s evidentiary rulings and feedback all through this trial evince a cumulative abuse of discretion that has disadvantaged defendants of their Fifth and Sixth Amendments rights to a good trial, to an enough protection, and to confront the witnesses towards them.”
However prosecutor Peter Koski stated the choose had “faithfully and persistently utilized the federal guidelines of proof.”
“That is a part of the defendants’ demonstrated sample of blaming others and unwillingness to just accept accountability for his or her conduct,” Koski instructed Partitions. “Now after an eight-week trial, they’re directing their blame at this courtroom.”
Partitions silently listened to attorneys Monday morning, a departure from his typical banter throughout arguments, earlier than finally denying the protection movement.
Prosecutors say Menendez pressured high-level officers within the Obama administration and different profession diplomats to badist Melgen resolve his enterprise disputes in trade for political contributions, free rides on Melgen’s personal jet, and a complicated resort suite on the Park Hyatt in Paris.
Partitions and the protection crew have battled all through the trial as attorneys have tried to introduce proof that Menendez was centered on the bigger coverage points raised by his pal’s disputes — not engaged in a corrupt scheme.
As soon as once more on Monday, Partitions batted away any suggestion of judicial misconduct on his half, particularly in regard to his failure to adequately tackle a “throw away” remark from the prosecutor earlier this month.
On cross-examination of Melgen’s spouse relating to a verify then-Florida Gov. Charlie Crist wrote to the Melgen household for his or her hospitality within the Dominican Republic in 2009, prosecutor Monique Abrishami ended with a bang: “So at the very least this politician is aware of easy methods to pay your husband again for issues?”
Protection attorneys raised the problem final week for instance of uneven therapy through the trial given the choose’s response was to inform the prosecutor “good strive” earlier than instructing the jury to ignore the query.
“In 30 one thing years on the bench, I’ve by no means heard a extra foolish objection,” Partitions stated — showing baffled Monday on the suggestion that he may have finished something extra to remedy the state of affairs. “I do not know what I used to be imagined to do, convey within the firing squad?”