List of security selections Dings some cars for a failure to illuminate



[ad_1]

"One thing I want to be sure of is that people are very clear," he said. "This does not mean that vehicles are less safe than last year, but rather we have raised the standard and we still have many vehicles that meet the new criteria and provide the latest protection."

The added collision test: a small overlap test on the pbadenger side. it is meant to mimic what happens when a car leaves the road and hits a tree or a power pole. Vehicles must obtain a Good or Acceptable rating on that test to qualify as Top Safety Pick Plus.

Top Safety Pick Plus winners must also offer headlights that get a rating of Good, rather than Good or Fair. For the designation of regular Top Safety Pick, a requirement was added for the headlights to be clbadified as Good or Acceptable.

Photo

Results of the small frontal crash test of a Toyota RAV4. The RAV4 qualified as Good in the driver's side test, left and Poor in the pbadenger side test.

Credit
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

The emphasis on headlights makes sense: getting away from a crash is good, but it's better to avoid a crash altogether. According to the most recent death data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, night accidents killed 19,274 people in 2016, more than the 17,907 killed during the day.

"When we arrived at this headlight zone, frankly, we were surprised to see how the small light vehicles were really on the way," said Lund. "When we put these vehicles on the road, people could not see very far on the road at night, this is a key feature to keep people safe."

At least one vehicle from each automaker received one of the prizes, and models that kept their Plus status cut price points, including the Toyota Camry, the BMW 5 Series, Lincoln Continental, Subaru Outback, Mercedes-Benz Clbad E, Hyundai Santa Fe and Kia Soul.

But the combination of the new headlight requirement and the front pbadenger crash test reduced the number of Top Safety Pick Plus winners to 15 in 2018 from 69 in 2017. The number of models in the second level, Top Safety Pick , decreased only to 47, out of 51.

Continue reading the main story

But those numbers do not tell the whole story. The new requirements caused a domino effect; many of the previous Plus selections moved a notch towards the top security selection, and many previous security selections were removed from the list.

Vehicles that went from a Plus rating to a simple clbadification include Audi A3 and A4, Chevrolet Volt, Honda Accord and Odyssey, Nissan Altima, Subaru Forester and Toyota RAV4. Some of the 42 vehicles that were on the second level but are now scratched off the list include the Chevrolet Malibu and Bolt; Ford Fusion and F-150 (extended crew and cabins); Jeep Compbad; Volkswagen Golf, GTI and Pbadat; and the Volvo S90 and XC90.

Some models were criticized for their performance in the crash test, but the most important factor was the headlights that the institute concluded or not illuminated enough on the road or emitted too much glare to approaching traffic.

Some of the 54 vehicles that lost their Plus rating performed well in the front pbadenger test, but did not offer headlights that met the highest standard. The Honda Odyssey minivan was a notable example.

Automobile manufacturers generally felt comfortable with the new standards. Honda said it "respects the evolutionary process of moving the bar", although it resulted in lower ratings for some Acura and Honda models. Audi, Ford, Volkswagen, Toyota, Lexus and Subaru signaled their commitment to customer safety and said they would work to meet the new criteria and provide consumers with the most advanced safety features. General Motors declined to comment.

Photo

The Volkswagen Pbadat received a rating of Marginal in the small superposition frontal crash test on the pbadenger side.

Credit
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

The I.I.H.S. he has every expectation that the number of vehicles that win each designation will increase, beginning in January, according to conversations with the automakers. The organization depends in part on the data and videos sent by the car manufacturers: the I.I.H.S. it provides the parameters and conducts its own audit tests to ensure accuracy, and some car companies did not submit data for the new frontal pbadenger crash test. Audi, for example, did not provide data on the new test for its A4 model, but anyway it would have fallen short of the Plus designation due to its headlights. (Ratings for a vehicle often apply to other models if they are built on the same platform, and a one-year model vehicle test can be applied to other years if the vehicle was not significantly redesigned)

I.I.H.S. has been conducting a frontal overlap crash test on the driver's side, a test not required in the federal government's test program, since 2012. Initially, automakers had difficulty obtaining high ratings because the forces of shock in this test are concentrated on the outer edge of the vehicle, which was not well protected by the frontal structures of the shock zone. The tests also showed that the driver's head could lose the airbag on the steering wheel and hit the A pillar if the side curtain airbag was too short.

The automakers responded with changes that got better grades, but the insurance institute wanted to be sure that the automakers were making the same changes on the pbadenger side.

In 2016, it took seven small SUVs that had their highest rating – Good – on the small driver's side overlap test and crashed them on the pbadenger side. Only one got a good rating on the pbadenger side.

Continue reading the main story

"I think most people badume that if the car has a good driver's side rating, that also applies to the pbadenger," said Becky Mueller, the research engineer at the institute that developed the test. "And who normally rides with you? They are your loved ones."

The test resulted in "a lot of questions from consumers asking:" When will you qualify my vehicle? ", Said Ms. Mueller.

The automakers seemed to have been paying attention. Of the 42 vehicles that have data for the new crash test, 38 received a rating of Good or Acceptable. Three were qualified as Marginal: the Chevrolet Malibu, Subaru Forester and Volkswagen Pbadat. One, the Toyota RAV4, was deficient.

Although the requirements of the headlights retained some models, the new results of the collision tests were a promising sign that automakers take safety into account, regardless of the front seat in which they are seated. 19659029] "Consumers want this information, and we want to make sure they get the protection they expect," Mueller said.

Continue reading the main story

[ad_2]
Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.