Dr. Yan and his team published their findings on Zenodo According to one report “the unusual features of the SARS Cove-2 genome rather than sophisticated laboratory modification by natural evolution and extinction of its potential synthetic pathway.”
The text is co-authored by Chinese scientists Shu Kang, Ji Guan, and Shenchang Hu And published in New York under observation of the Rule of Law institution, which was established under the Rule of Law Foundation in New York Chinese carpenter Guo Vengui, who has been deported to the US for several years following allegations of crimes including corruption and sexual offenses in China. The Society’s declared mission is to “highlight corruption, obstruction, illegality, cruelty, false imprisonment, excessive punishment, harassment, and inhumanity in China’s political, legal, business and financial systems.”
Kovid-19 “Adapted From Already Determined Bat Coronovirus”
In its summary, the report states that “the genome sequence of SARS-CoV-2 has the potential for genetic engineering.”Through which the virus has gained the ability to target humans with advanced virility and infectiousness.”
The report also claims that the novel has been adapted by coronovirus Coronaviruses already found naturally in bats are identified by the Chinese military.
The research follows the “three lines of evidence” that Yan and his team say Kovid-19 is a laboratory-based virus.
Kovid-19 “Suspiciously Resembles 2003 SARS Epidemic”
The first of these states: “The genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 is suspiciously similar to the bat coronavirus discovered by military laboratories For the Third Military Medical University (Chongqing, China) and Nanjing Command (Medical Research Institute of Nanjing, China).
The second line of evidence presented states: “The receptor-binding motif (RBM) within the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, which determines the host specificity of the virus, resembles SARS-CoV from the 2003 pandemic. In a suspicious manner. Genomic evidence suggests that RBM has been genetically manipulated. “
A third finding put forward by Yan and his team stated: “The spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 contains a unique furine-cleavage site, which is known to increase viral infectivity and cell tropism. Nevertheless, this cleavage site is completely absent in this particular class of coronaviruses found in nature. Furthermore, rare codons associated with this additional sequence suggest the strong possibility that this furin-cleavage site is not a product of natural development And the SARS-Cove-2 genome can be spontaneously inserted into co-infected tissue cultures or animals by techniques other than simple serial or multi-strain recombination events. ”
Kovid-19 “A Laboratory products manufactured using bat coronavir “
In summary, Yan and his team suggested that the novel Coronavirus was developed “Bat coronavirus as a template and / or backbone as a laboratory product created using ZC45 and / or ZXC21. ”
The report states that “ZC45 and ZXC21 were discovered between July 2015 and February 2017. And separated and separated by the aforesaid military research laboratories. “It is also said that when a non-military laboratory, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, a published Nature Article The report noted “a conflicting close relationship between SARS-CoV-2 and ZC45 / ZXC2, rather than RaTG13, was quickly closed for ‘reform'”.
The report accuses many publications of succumbing to political pressure or experiencing “conflict of interest” so as not to publish findings that differ from natural fundamentals.. The report states, “Existing scientific publications that support the theory of natural origins rely too much on one piece of evidence – a previously discovered bat coronovirus named RaTG13, which is 96% with SARS-CoV-2. The nucleotide shares sequence identity, ”the report states.