Home / Entertainment / «Case No. 23» .. Doubts about Oscar nominations – cultures

«Case No. 23» .. Doubts about Oscar nominations – cultures



The Academy of American Film Arts and Sciences revealed the list of best-rated films to compete for the 90th Academy Award in February, which included one Arab film, despite the nomination of many Arab works, amid speculation of political interference in determining The winners of the Lebanese film "Issue No. 23" were chosen by the Lebanese filmmaker Ziad Douiri, who has been participating in many international and Arab forums in recent months, including the Venice Film Festival, Telurid Festival in the United States, A clown

Politicizing the awards

Art and politics, both of which circumvent the other under the influence of reality, to control the political side sometimes in the awards and selection of participants, and there There are many doubts about the selection of the film director Ziad Douiri alone, next to 8 other films, the Chilean film "Wonderful Woman", the German "In The Ved", Hungarian "En Paddy and Sol", Israeli "Foxtrot", Russian "Loveless" and Senegalese "Felicity", the South African "The Wond", and the Swedish "The Square".

The doubts about the Lebanese director are summarized in Because of his film "The Shock" in Tel Aviv in 2013, in which he recorded with a number of Israeli actors, and remained there for several months until the film ended. During that period, he cooperated with Israeli producers, putting question marks on

Wide rejection

Over the past months, the film «Case No. 23» has been a case rejected by anti-normalization organizations with Israel, A major event was held during the 28th edition of the Carthage Film Festival, in protest against the participation and presentation of the film in the official competition In Tunisia, stressing that the film is in conflict with the popular, patriotic and national constants included in the constitution, especially since the director of the film calls for normalization with the state of the Israeli entity.

The organizers of the Cinema Days Festival in Palestine were banned last October due to widespread protests by the people The Palestinian people, and in front of these deep voices on their homeland and land against the Zionist entity that plundered all the goods of Palestine, officials in the West Bank city of Ramallah responded, and the film was lifted from the theaters.

Public Opinion Issue

The film deals with Lebanon's civil war and religious affiliation The film begins with an argument between Tony, a Christian Lebanese and Yasser, a Palestinian Muslim who lives in a Lebanese refugee camp, because of dirty water from a pipe. And the exchange of insults, until the first came to court in order to feel insulted.

It seems a passing event, but the small things sometimes cause the door to open and can not be closed. Yasser said that he was a Palestinian. He said to him, "If only Sharon were to be tried for your father's death." That sentence that he had

The media amplification of the case leads to Lebanon approaching a social explosion, prompting Tony and Yaser to reconsider their prejudices throughout their lives. The film combines complex feelings Between the humanitarian and political aspects in cinematic language, highlighting the civil war in Lebanon, and highlighting the value of justice through the court between the two parties.

Case No. 23 from Adel Karam, Rita Hayek, Camille Salama, Christine Choueiri, And Palestinian actor Kamel Al-Basha, who won the Best Actor Award for a role E in the film in the official competition of the Venice Film Festival in its last session.


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.