A brand new lawsuit is once more calling into query Uber’s background test insurance policies and the way it displays its drivers.
On Tuesday, two nameless ladies filed a grievance in California towards Uber claiming the ridesharing firm had falsely introduced its service as protected to passengers. Both ladies say they had been raped by drivers. They state that they ordered the service after a few drinks, believing it to be protected.
“Uber’s advertising campaigns make the assertion that it provides the best option for a safe ride home after a night of drinking,” the go well with alleges. “[But] what happened to Ms. Does 1 and 2 is happening to women across the U.S. Shockingly, it is happening with greater frequency.”
The new go well with is searching for class motion standing to incorporate people who’ve alleged or reported “rape, sexual assault or gender-motivated violence or harassment” by Uber drivers up to now 4 yr. The lawsuit claims that “thousands of female passengers have endured unlawful conduct by their Uber drivers” over the previous seven years.
In an announcement, Uber mentioned it “received this complaint today and we are in the process of reviewing it. These allegations are important to us and we take them very seriously.”
Attorney Jeanne Christensen from employment legislation agency Wigdor LLP, who introduced the case, is asking on Uber to launch information that proves to clients that it’s, the truth is, statistically protected to journey in an Uber. “They should be forced to report, on some kind of periodic level, how many reports [of assault, rape] they’ve had. And based on the reports, were there investigations that actually resulted in the termination of a driver?” Christensen mentioned in a name with CNN Tech.
Her agency has been following the problem of alleged rape and assault by Uber drivers since 2014, when it filed the New Delhi driver rape case. “I’m not asking for anything crazy. It’s not crazy. If they don’t have an issue, then they should be waving that data around.”
The go well with asks for an injunction that may direct the corporate to make modifications to its screening course of, in addition to implement new monitoring of drivers to guard riders from rape, assault, and gender-based harassment.
Uber has up to now shunned the thought of fingerprint-based background assessments in most markets, saying the checks will be expensive and gradual, and impression the corporate’s skill to consistently deliver on new drivers.
Questions about how the corporate screens its drivers had been raised once more earlier this month after the suspect in a terror assault in Manhattan was revealed to be a driver for each Uber and Lyft.
Uber mentioned it was shortly and aggressively reviewing Sayfullo Saipov’s historical past with the corporate however hadn’t discovered any security experiences that raised considerations. Lyft additionally did not discover any purple flags related along with his account, the corporate mentioned. Both Uber and Lyft mentioned they had been in touch with legislation enforcement authorities over the New York assault.
Related: What we all know (and do not know) about Uber background checks
The 58-page grievance filed Tuesday particulars 17 security measures that the corporate might implement to make riders safer. Those embrace requiring drivers to put in GPS monitoring methods of their automobiles slightly than counting on the app which will be turned off, in addition to performing legal background checks each six months.
In normal, Uber says it searches data for the previous seven years. But in accordance with the go well with, for drivers who moved to the U.S. lower than seven years in the past, the corporate does not search to acquire data of their earlier nation of residence.
CNNMoney (New York) First revealed November 14, 2017: 7:58 PM ET