Lawmakers, experts shun prospect of Trump as Russian hack

President Trump’s sacking characterization of a massive cyber attack targeting several US agencies sparked a backlash from lawmakers and cyber security experts on Sunday, amid growing questions over the president’s refusal to say Russia was likely to be behind the intrusion is.

Joseph R. one month before the presidential election. Biden assumes office, Trump began to live with his lie-filled campaign to reverse the results of the November election, and gave no indication that the United States would like to punish those responsible for an unprecedented violation, Those whose full scope was still being evaluated.

“Russia acted with dexterity,” Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) said on NBC’s “Meet the Press”. Romney, one of only a handful of congressmen to criticize Trump’s conduct regarding the election, said that “we know the president has a blind spot in Russia.”

During his term, Trump consistently acknowledged that Russian hackers tried to help him and hurt his rival Hillary Clinton before the 2016 presidential election. He has been characterized as Russian President Vladimir Putin, accepting the autocratic leader’s word on US intelligence agencies.

In a series of tweets on Saturday, Trump quashed the cyber intrusion, saying it is “far more in the fake news media than in reality” and “everything is fine.” He also suggested that China could be a culprit and unabashedly continue its attack on the integrity of the country’s election system based on targeting voting machines by hackers. The day after the president’s claim, Secretary Michael Pompeo announced in a radio interview that “we can clearly say that it was the Russians who were engaged in this activity.”

Trump’s comments drew sharp criticism from Senate Intelligence Committee ranking Democrat Virginia Sen. Mark Warner. “When the President of the United States either tries to deflect or is not ready to call the adversary,” Warner said, “he is not making our country safe.”

Warner, who was informed by intelligence officials on the hack, said the incursion was “exceptionally serious” and added “all signs of Russia” as the culprit.

Cyber ​​security experts said the highly sophisticated attack on the US computer network was part of a broader cyber-espionage operation that involved finding and infringing vulnerabilities into products and software purchased by government agencies and corporations. The break-in was so aggressive, he said, that it was expected that it would take months to decide the scope, and that the attackers would take longer to drive away.

Kevin Mandia, CEO of cyberspace security firm FireEye, said, “It was not a shooting on the information highway for a shooting on the highway – it was a sniper round from someone a few miles away from your house.”

Mandia interviewed on CBS’s “Face the Nation”, calling the methodology “completely cryptic”.

Experts and government officials have determined that last year the hackers had broken into the network of SolarWinds, an Austin-based company, and dropped malware in a software update that was sent to more than 17,000 customers worldwide. Once government agencies and companies downloaded the update, the malware allowed hackers to gain access to those systems, and began exploiting those backsteads nine months ago.

Even some GOP Trump allies, who have strictly avoided criticizing Trump for failing to point a finger at Russia, urged a strong US response.

On “Fox News Sunday”, Sen. John Barraso (R-Wyo) said, “We need to give a tremendous, effective, punitive response so that people pay a price for it – think twice about doing it again.” Barraso, the No. 3 Republican in the Senate, said the United States seemed “blinded” by the hack.

The mixed message from Trump and his senior aides about the cyber attack is disturbing, said Biden’s incoming Chief of Staff Ron Nan.

“What we heard is a message from the Secretary of State, which is a different message from the White House,” Clance said in CBS’s “The Nation the Face”. America’s position on the hack, he said, “should come in a clear and unambiguous voice.”

Biden, once in office, “is going to step down as president to reduce the ability of foreign actors to launch these types of attacks on our country,” Klein said.

But how to respond to a cyber attack is a matter of growing debate. Romney interviewed on CNN’s “State of the Union”, calling for “like vengeance” or greater vengeance. But more recently, Christopher Krebs, head of the Cyberspace and Infrastructure Agency, took precautions.

“I’ll be very careful with pursuing it,” Krebs also interviewed on CNN.

Krebs, who was sacked by Trump for thwarting the president’s unfounded claims of widespread election fraud, said “we need to negotiate between like-minded countries” which constitutes an acceptable type of cyber-espionage.

Other experts said the US would have a difficult time justifying retaliation for the hack that was clearly related to espionage, not destruction. He said that the US government regularly referred to sneaking into other countries’ cyber networks to obtain information.

“It’s business as usual”, said Bruce Schneier, a cyber security expert and a lecturer at Harvard University. “The National Security Agency talks like this all the time, and we’re better at it.”

Christopher Krebs speaks in a microphone to testify before the Senate committee on 16 December.

Christopher Krebs testified before a Senate committee on December 16, saying Russia is “exceptionally good” at cyber espionage.

(Greg Nash / Pool via AP)

Moscow has denied any involvement in the cyber attack. But Putin was reported to have praised the SVR foreign intelligence service on an official Russian website, suspected to be behind the attack. Russian leader, Speaking at an event While praising the role of Russia’s security services, did not mention the hacking allegations, but praised SVR’s efforts for national sovereignty.

Krebs acknowledged Russian skills in cyber-espionage in his CNN interview.

“They are exceptionally good at it,” he said. “They are calm, they are intentional, they are patient and they are careful.”

Outside experts agreed – and warned that the decline would continue for a long time to come.

“We are in the early inning of this,” said Dmitry Alperovich, a former chief technical officer at Crowdstream, a cyber security firm that is now the chair of the Silverado Policy Accelerator, a Washington-based think tank. “Due to the scale and size of this attack, and how good the Russians are at burying themselves in the network, these organizations are going to take several months to clean up.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.