John Kelly refuses to apologize for false assaults on Florida congresswoman

White Home Chief of Workers John F. Kelly stated Monday he wouldn’t apologize for the false badaults he leveled towards Rep. Frederica S. Wilson (D-Fla.) this month when he sought to defend President Trump for his dealing with of a condolence name to the widow of a fallen soldier.

On Oct. 19, in a uncommon look on the White Home media briefing, Kelly attacked Wilson as an “empty barrel” and accused her of grandstanding at a public occasion two years in the past in Florida by taking credit score for securing federal funding for a brand new constructing.

Video of the occasion quickly launched by the Florida Solar Sentinel confirmed Wilson did no such factor. Fairly, she used her speech to reward the 2 slain FBI brokers in whose reminiscence the constructing was named. Wilson accused Kelly of “character badbadination,” and members of the Congressional Black Caucus demanded that Kelly apologize.

In an interview to be broadcast Monday evening, Fox Information Channel host Laura Ingraham requested Kelly whether or not he had one thing to apologize for.

“Oh, no,” Kelly replied. “No. By no means. Nicely, I will apologize if I must. However for one thing like that, completely not. I stand by my feedback.”

[In sparring with a grieving widow, Trump follows his no-apology playbook]

Kelly advised that he could have been accusing Wilson of grandstanding in a personal dialogue, versus in her public speech, though his remark to Ingraham was imprecise.

“I will return and discuss earlier than her feedback and on the reception afterwards,” Kelly stated. “Once more, it was a bundle deal. Do not need to get into it.”

Kelly went on to say that Myeshia Johnson, the widow of fallen Sgt. La David Johnson, has acted inside her rights to talk out publicly about Trump’s dealing with of his condolence name.

“So far as the younger widow goes, she has each proper to say what she desires to say,” Kelly advised Ingraham. “However it’s the politicization of one thing that was so from the guts.”

Ingraham’s interview — considered one of Kelly’s uncommon public appearances — delved into a variety of different matters, together with the elimination of Accomplice and different historic monuments, a difficulty that has animated Trump in current months.

Ingraham requested Kelly a few historic church in Alexandria, Va., the place former president George Washington worshiped, deciding to take away plaques memorializing each Washington and Accomplice normal Robert E. Lee as a result of they had been thought of illiberal.

[Historic Alexandria church decides to remove plaques honoring Washington, Lee]

“Nicely, historical past’s historical past,” Kelly stated. “And there are specific issues in historical past that weren’t so good and different issues that had been very, excellent. I feel we make a mistake, although, and as a society and definitely as people, once we take what’s at present accepted as proper and fallacious and return 100, 200, 300 years or extra and say what these, you recognize, what Christopher Columbus did was fallacious.”

Kelly added: “Human historical past, our tradition is an evolving factor. There shall be 100 or 200 years from now folks that criticize us for what we do, and I badume they will tear down, you recognize, statues of folks that we revere at present. I feel it is harmful. … I feel it is simply very, very harmful and it exhibits you what, how a lot of an absence of appreciation of historical past, and what historical past is.”


Supply hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.