by Deborah Danan12 Nov 2017zero
TEL AVIV – The Trump administration has begun drafting a proposal based mostly on the so-called two-state answer with the intention of reaching a ultimate standing Israeli-Palestinian settlement, the New York Times cited badysts and U.S. officers as saying on Saturday.
According to White House officers, the plan will try to handle “perennial dividing points” such because the standing of Jerusalem and West Bank settlements.
“We have spent a lot of time listening to and engaging with the Israelis, Palestinians and key regional leaders over the past few months to help reach an enduring peace deal,” the Times quoted Special Negotiator to the Middle East Jason Greenblatt as saying. “We are not going to put an artificial timeline on the development or presentation of any specific ideas and will also never impose a deal.”
“Our goal is to facilitate, not dictate, a lasting peace agreement to improve the lives of Israelis and Palestinians and security across the region,” he added.
Authors of the draft embody Greenblatt, President Donald Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser Jared Kushner, Deputy National Security Adviser for Strategy Dina Powell and U.S. Ambbadador to Israel David Friedman.
The 4 may even seek the advice of with Donald Blome, the consul-general in Jerusalem, and others from the State Department and National Security Council. The plan may take till subsequent yr to be formulated, the report mentioned.
The Times quoted some badysts as saying that the proposal would necessitate confidence-building measures from each side. “For Israel, it could include limiting settlement construction to current blocs without taking new land, recommitting to a two-state solution and redesignating a small part of the West Bank to give Palestinians more control,” the report mentioned.
“For the Palestinians, it could include resuming full security cooperation with Israel, holding off seeking further international recognition and ending payments to families of Palestinians imprisoned for terrorist attacks. Arab states, particularly Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates and Jordan, could add their own commitments, like overflights by Israeli pbadenger planes, visas for business people and telecommunications links.”
But the report went on to cite a White House official who dismissed such necessities as “mere speculation.”
Trump has by no means expressed outright endorsement of the two-state answer, as a substitute saying he prefers the answer that “both parties like best.”
Late final month, a senior White House official reiterated this place, saying the president “is personally committed to achieving a peace deal between Israelis and Palestinians that would help usher in an era of greater regional peace and prosperity.”
Trump “reaffirms that peace between Israelis and Palestinians can only be negotiated directly between the two parties and that the United States will continue working closely with the parties to make progress toward that goal. No deal will be imposed on Israelis and Palestinians. We are committed to facilitating a deal that improves conditions for both parties,” the official added.
On Saturday, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas addressed a crowd in Gaza saying that Palestinians might revert to endorsing a one-state answer for Arabs and Jews – a situation that will imply the tip of the Jewish state – if the now “endangered” two-state answer fails.
“The two-state solution is now in real danger,” Abbas mentioned throughout a memorial for late PLO chief Ybader Arafat. “We will demand equal rights for the folks of historic Palestine if a two-state answer will not be carried out.