Is it better to change or sign at this stage?

DALLAS – There's a reason why the Bruins have been linked to Russian sniper Ilya Kovalchuk, and they still keep the door ajar for 33-year-old forward Rick Nash.

The B's have a strong group of proven veterans and several waves of young talent who go through their system in an effective mix of old and young who scored 112 points in the regular season. But they also clearly have some needs on their NHL list that can not be met simply by their own players. That fact was pretty obvious when they fell in five games against Tampa Bay Lightning in the second round of the playoffs.

A goal scorer established on the second line is what all the fuss is about with Kovalchuk and Nash went to the NHL on Draft Weekend in Dallas, and the Bruins are clearly very interested in the 35-year-old Russian, as well as San Jose, Las Vegas and Los Angeles.

"We talk very specifically about our list with [Kovalchuk] and where we see he fits, and what he brings to the table, we will be happy to continue exploring, but I do not know where he will go. force [are all positives]"said Don Sweeney. "Five years have pbaded since the NHL [for Kovalchuk] and a lot has changed in those five years if you think about what has happened in the league, but I think it will be fine, it has played in great stages and it has been very successful. unique and fits into a slot that we could use if it is carried out successfully. "

There are other options in the trade market for the Bruins, however, if things fall with the extreme options at Kovalchuk and Nash.

Per Hockey Night in Canada's Elliotte Friedman, Flyers forward Wayne Simmonds was to present Philadelphia with a list of teams where it could be traded and would be another good fit "now" for Black and Gold. [19659007] All this raises the question of what the Bruins prefer philosophically, however.

Signing Kovalchuk would only cost the team money in a short-term deal at this point, and the Bruins have much of that, approximately $ 12 million in space capitalization, with the salary cap going up to $ 7.5 million for the next season. Signing Nash would be about the same money as Kovalchuk and would also support the major investment the Bruins made for him in the deadline by moving Ryan Spooner, a first-round pick and prospect Ryan Lindgren for just a couple of months from the former. Services of the Rangers forward.

Dealing with a Simmonds, Jeff Skinner or Corey Perry would involve moving valuable young players, and in the case of Simmonds it would also mean a large contract for large amounts of money after next season. That's a double investment of the Bruins to occupy exactly the same position in the second-line wing, so the natural question is whether Boston would prefer to go to free agency on exchanges to get outside help at this time.

With other NHL general managers asking about the likes of Jake DeBrusk in many deals for term players, it's something Sweeney should consider. It would be worth considering if the question becomes Danton Heinen or Anders Bjork instead, and it may even become a bit more of a realistic round-trip discussion.

"You always descend what the terms of the deal are, you know you're giving up the badets to maybe fill a hole you do not really have too much, but you're also changing the term and the dollars in those situations. We've filled some holes right and wrong in those situations, and those deals are what they are, "Sweeney said. "Certainly, I think that growing and having the depth that we have tried [build] for our organization has been beneficial, now, if we have areas where a team now wants to see that and we can change something to fill a definite need … we are going to see that.

"I'm not opposed to that. But we also realize that we have some young players who have played only one year in the National Hockey League with some success. I would like to continue seeing how that develops. But it's a good opportunity to see how other teams in the league also see these players and what their market value is. "

Do the Bruins get many curious calls about the interest of their young players in the NHL? [19659014] "Yes, there have been many guys who have been intrigued. And I think we're fine, "Sweeney said. We've looked a little under the sheets and we just want to make sure that if we make a move it's for the right reasons. I want to make a good hockey business if we go that way. We have good players and we have good young players who have taken on roles, and hopefully they just keep growing. "

What to do with all this?

Sweeney is right to be cautious after spending a A lot of badets for Nash in a move that finally did not work despite the best intentions.The Bruins have built something good and sustainable for the next five years, as long as they can add a couple of key pieces (left shot D-man , big scorer end) sooner than later.It's the right time to spend on a free agent that breaks the game in Kovalchuk and give up only money in the process.

Young coveted players trade are just the movement Right in the deals where the Bruins get a piece, they're sure they're going to be in Boston, and productive, long-term.This is the reason why the Bruins press They will go strongly to Kovalchuk if they can get it for a couple of years in the range of $ 5-6 million per season. It's just money or Black and Gold, and once again this off season they have large amounts to spend with some good options to spend it.


Source link