Early Friday, Indian Army reported Newsweek That “Pakistan launched an unrecoverable ceasefire violation with mortar and other weapons attack in Kanzalwan village in Gurez sector of Bandipora State, located on the Line of Control (LoC) dividing the two rivals in Kashmir”.
There was a trend of official communication from India.
“The response is being responded to,” the military said.
Newsweek offers membership>
There are reports of a recurring exchange in the stressed area, including an incident two days ago. An Islamic official said Islamabad accused New Delhi of confrontation, saying that in both cases “the Indian Army resorted to unequal fire in the Nekrun sector, targeting military outposts and civilians across the Line of Control.” Newsweek.
“These unilateral incitements were responded to [to] appropriately [the] Pakistan Army, “the official said.
“The Indian Army constantly targets the civilian population across the LoC while they are busy with routine tasks,” the official said. “Such unprofessional and immoral activities are admitted by accusations of sponsoring terrorism across the LOC.”
Newsweek offers membership>
The Pakistani Foreign Ministry on Thursday also accused India of injuring three civilians in the Andhrala Male village from across the border against the Hotsring and Jandrot sectors. A senior Indian diplomat was allegedly summoned in response to the incident, which the ministry argued was to distract from the deteriorating humanitarian and security situation in India-administered Kashmir.
The region has been in an effective position since August last year, when a constitutional change removed the semi-autonomous status of the state of Jammu and Kashmir and was flooded with paramilitary forces. The rest of the state hosts a rebellion accusing New Delhi of supporting Islamabad, resulting in several infiltration attempts and street fighting.
Such confrontations have often proved controversial.
In another statement sent to Newsweek On Friday, the Indian Army admitted preliminary evidence to its personnel indicating “more than their powers” and “disciplined” their disciplinary codes, which led to the death of three Kashmiri men in an incident in July. The families have argued that they were workers without affiliation with terrorist groups.
“Their involvement in terrorism or related activities is being investigated by the police,” the statement said. “The Indian Army is committed to the ethical conduct of operations. Further updates on the case will be given from time to time without affecting the law process of the land.”
But Islamic Mujahideen groups like Jaish-e-Mohammed are drawing criticism from all over India but also from all over America.
In a statement jointly adopted on the eve of the 19th anniversary of the 9/11 attack against the US, Washington and New Delhi, Pakistan called for urgent, sustained, and irreversible action to ensure that it was in control. There is no region. Used for terrorist attacks, and to expedite justice for the perpetrators of such attacks. “
In a statement sent to NewsweekThe Pakistani Foreign Ministry said it “strongly rejects inappropriately referenced references” to the country, stating that it is “most affected by cross-border terrorism, sponsored and supported by India.”
The Pakistani statement stressed that its struggle received global support.
“The international community also acknowledges Pakistan’s efforts, sacrifices and successes in the fight against terrorism,” the statement said.
Islamabad was backed by Beijing in this argument, where Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian insisted last week that “Pakistan’s tremendous efforts and sacrifices in fighting terrorism should be recognized and respected by the international community.”
China’s wait-in is no coincidence.
Deep economic and security relations between the People’s Republic and the Islamic Republic have fueled what China refers to as its “all-weather strategic cooperative partnership” with Pakistan. At the same time, a series of bloody clashes between Chinese and Indian troops in the higher reaches of the Himalayas mean that relations between Beijing and New Delhi have been put to their greatest test in decades.
India’s past with China may not be as bloody as its history with Pakistan, with which it fought four deadly wars since the 1948 Partition. Although India and China fought over the disputed territory in 1962 and threatened to repeat this bitter experience this year, both sides rejoiced at home on my nationalist tide.
The two militants are engaged in a series of skirmishes along their actual disputed Line of Control in May, with casualties on both sides in June. The two sides have increased reinforcements, and earlier this month escalated tensions and led to the first cross-border firing in nearly half a century.
Defense chiefs and top diplomats from both major countries met in Russia, a mutual partner, in an effort to ease the precarious situation. While Chinese and Indian officials continue to accuse each other of trying to “change the status quo” in a poorly marked split between India’s Ladakh and China’s Aksai Chin, they agree to a five-point de-escalation plan Has happened.
The plan calls for establishing new confidence-building measures to enhance bilateral relations, recall troops, follow up on previous deals, maintain communication and avoid other incidents.
But soon after the latest incident, the Indian Army reported Newsweek Until last week “there was no change on the ground,” and both sides clung to their stories.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin told reporters at a press conference on Thursday, “Chinese border troops have always strictly observed related agreements between the two countries and to protect China’s territorial sovereignty and maintain peace and stability Are committed. ”
Wenbin claimed that India was solely responsible for the dispute.
He said that the pressure now is that the Indian side should rectify its mistake immediately, hit the ground as soon as possible and take concrete action to reduce tension and reduce the temperature on the border.