Hydroxychloroquine is trending again. It is still not a treatment for COVID-19.


There is no hard scientific evidence to suggest hydroxychloroquine to prevent, treat or suggest COVID-19.

Getty

Hydroxychloroquine, an anti-malarial drug that has been used for decades to treat autoimmune diseases such as arthritis, is not a cure for COVID-19. A pledge of studies, less than a week old and published in the prestigious scientific journal Nature, has shown that the drug does not have sufficient antiviral activity. And as more data rolls out of human clinical trials, hydroxychloroquine is coming up short. very Less. It does not protect against COVID-19 and it does not fix it either.

So why is it in the news again?

It appears that it is trending largely due to a series of viral videos published by right-wing publication Britbart, being widely shared on social media, especially on Facebook and Twitter.

On Monday, a contingent of physicians, wearing white coats and calling themselves “America’s frontline doctors” held a summit in Washington on the US Supreme Court’s move. The summit was organized by the right-wing “Tea Party Patriots Foundation” and is intended to last two days.

Videos of “frontline doctors” advocating the use of hydroxychloroquine as a “cure” outside the Supreme Court began online Monday afternoon. We have decided not to link to them but Analysis by an NBC Internet reporter Indicates that he viewed more than 20 million times on Facebook.

In particular, Stella Emanuel, a Houston physician and preacher, has attracted the attention of Sher, causing an irrational argument about the use of hydroxychloroquine in the 350 patients who visit her clinic. It has been viewed millions of times on Facebook and even tweeted by Donald Trump Jr. United States President Donald Trump also retweeted the video.

As a result, Emmanuel’s personal follower count on Twitter increased to around 30,000 in a span of a few hours. Twitter has started deleting videos associated with the summit, including Emmanuel and Facebook, which have continuously removed the videos from their platforms. According to Facebook’s insight tool CrowdTangle, it was one of the top-performing posts on the platform at the time of its removal.

The spotlight has been placed on Emmanuel’s speech, but it uses mainly non-legal language to argue that hydroxychloroquine can fix COVID-19, Andrew McLaughlan, head of Sydney Pharmacy School, University of Sydney accordingly.

“Passion and anecdote do not provide strong evidence of the safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment and prevention of COVID-19,” he says.

“Good evidence for guide practice comes from carefully controlled studies, results examined and peer review to ensure conclusions and claims are strong and correct.”

McLachlan also notes that hydroxychloroquine is the most widely investigated drug for COVID-19 based on the number of active trials. He points to the RECOVERY trial as one of the most rigorous, led by Oxford University. It did not find a significant difference in mortality and did not show benefit for patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Nevertheless, it continues to be pursued as a viable treatment option by various sections of the media, including the likes of Breitbart.

Scientists say the arguments have been obscured by mass politicization.

“It’s extraordinary to see [the] The hydroxychloroquine agenda is being pushed on despite overwhelming evidence against it, “says Gaten Burgio, a geneticist at Australian National University in Canberra,” It reminds me of a very anti-Waxers movement. ”

In June, the Food and Drug Administration Canceled the emergency use of hydroxychloroquine For COVID-19 patients, it does not confer any clinical benefit on the basis of increasing evidence and in some cases may be the cause of heart problems. There was also a high-profile study, Published in Lancet in May, Suggesting hydroxychloroquine increased mortality. Even Convinced WHO to stop Its hydroxychloroquine test. However, the study was mired in controversy as it devised much of the data used in the study. It was later withdrawn.

Retracing aside, the arguments against using hydroxychloroquine date back to the beginning of the epidemic. The idea that COVID-19 may be a useful drug to prevent or treat it is increasingly investigated in more powerful, more important clinical trials.

In short, there is overwhelming evidence that hydroxychloroquine does not work. Getting viral on the internet has not changed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.