By Patrick Clark | Bloomberg News
Now that Amazon.com has narrowed down the list of cities it is considering for its second location in North America, it's time for a new round of everyone's favorite saloon game: to discuss which city is best suited to the technological giant .  After the e-commerce company said it was looking for a second headquarters to relieve pressure on its Seattle base, it received proposals from 238 locations, full of economic incentives and marketing gimmicks.
It has now reduced the field to 20 locations, including three offers from the Washington DC area, where Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos has taken root, as well as proposals from smaller Midwestern cities (Columbus, Ohio, Indianapolis) and important population centers (New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Toronto and Dallas).
Start the day with the news you need from the Bay Area and beyond.
Subscribe to our new day of the week newsletter.
Leaving aside the economic incentives, and there are many, these are some pros and cons of the places in Amazon's long list.
Pros: A major airline hub and home to large corporations, such as UPS, Coca-Cola and Delta. A recent focus on redevelopment projects such as the BeltLine, a series of parks built on an old railway spur running through the city, can increase the city's appeal.
Cons: It's still not that great. Amazon is proud that its urban locations in Seattle are passable and passable, and a more suburban city like Atlanta can contradict that spirit. Terrible traffic, too.
Pros: Near the distribution and business center of Dallas, but much more fashionable. There is no income tax from Texas, an established technology industry and home to Whole Foods, which Amazon recently acquired.
Cons: Small airport. Despite the growing population, it still does not feel like a big city in the US. UU
Pros: Near Harvard, MIT and a host of other colleges and universities, an airport with nonstop flights to Seattle and Washington, DC, and a history of provide relocation benefits, such as the incentives that the city offered to GE in 2015.
Cons: It has some of the same drawbacks as New York: high cost of living, narrow residential real estate markets and commercial, without the same cultural services and depth of talent.
Pros: A large concentration of operations, marketing, finance and sales employees to search from other industries. Good public transit, passable neighborhoods and a variety of housing options, from downtown apartments to traditional suburbs.
Cons: The shootings in the city have become national news, and the state is still coming out of financial binds. Taking your government out of debt could require tax increases and cuts to public services.
Pros: A major research university in the state of Ohio, a fast growing economy and cheap housing.
Cons: Housing is cheap for a reason.
Pros: Has been a magnet for corporate relocations over the past two decades, offering high quality of life and access to a deep group of workers. There is no state income tax, and unlike Austin, it is a big city and an airline center.
Cons: The suburbs of Dallas can seem pretty boring to Amazon employees accustomed to cultural amenities in downtown Seattle.  Denver
Pros: Denver is already popular with technology companies. Colorado has strong engineering schools and defeats the other finalists when it comes to proximity to fresh powder. Fresh pot, and legal, too, for those who participate.
Cons: The influx of workers to Denver's burgeoning technology center has already extended the local housing market. It does not offer much geographical diversity of Seattle.
Do you read it on your phone? Stay up to date with our free mobile application. Get it from the Apple app store or the Google Play store.
Pros: The salaries of technology companies would go far in the heart, and the choice of Indianapolis would make Amazon could be said to be the most important employer in Central America.
Cons: The size of Amazon's headquarters could sink the city's residential and commercial real estate markets. As in Columbus, cheap housing is not a mystery.
Pros: The Amazon Studios division of the tech giant is fast becoming a force in Hollywood, with original broadcast TV series such as "Transparent" and "Man in" the High Castle "- is headquartered in Santa Monica.
Cons: It's an expensive place to live, a difficult place to build and, like Denver, it does not offer much geographical diversity of Seattle.
Pros: Good traffic, large population, and is close to New York and Washington, with much lower housing costs.  Cons: Amazon would have to convince workers in those cities that giving up cultural amenities for cheaper housing is a commercial value.
Pros: Top start of the Carnegie M ellon robotics and IA university, which has already attracted major technology companies such as Google and Uber. Close to the main distribution centers in the middle of the country.
Cons: It is far from other major cities and technology centers.
Raleigh, North Carolina
Pros: Part of an existing technology center; offers cheap housing, good quality of life and the possibility that Amazon put its stamp on a city in a way that could not in more established meters.
Cons: Confrontations for gender identity and other burning political issues suggest that North Carolina is still fighting for its own identity.
Pros: An important financial and technological center and a population that would place it among the 10 best in the US. UU Metropolitan areas. Potentially easier to hire people from abroad because of a more open tone about immigration from the Canadian government versus the US.
Cons: Housing prices are high compared to cities like Atlanta. The city also does not have much space for housing and commercial development required for HQ2 in the city center. Moving comprehensive operations north of the border carries political risks in dealing with the Trump administration.
Pros: A strong technology workforce and proximity to legislators and regulators. Bezos took root in the area with his acquisition of the Washington Post in 2013.
Cons: Lack of space and zoning restrictions could make it difficult to find enough office space. Pasting the central offices in the burbs would facilitate the search for land, but it would be more difficult to attract workers. And you do not get a US senator UU Fight for you at The Hill.
Christine Maurus, Natalie Wong and Doug Alexander of Bloomberg contributed.