Sen. Jose Hawley, R-Mo., Is rejecting the idea that he abused his authority or supported the rebellion by objecting to the accreditation of Electoral College votes last week.
“Around this time, anyone who has objected has been called a ‘rebel’,” Hawley wrote in Wednesday’s column for Southeast Egypt.
Sadly, most of the media and many members of the Washington establishment want to deceive Americans into thinking that those who instigated the violence expressed concern that it was wrong. This charge itself is corrosive and dangerous.
He said that “democratic debate is not violence. This is really how we avoid that violence.”
Both Hawley and Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, created a stir after announcing the purpose of certification ahead of last week’s events. And when the Congress was reconstituted after the attacks, they both held their objection.
Mishri Govardhan Stats Silent to act as Joss for Josh
“Some wondered why I stuck with my objection after the violence in the Capitol,” Hawley wrote. “The reason is simple: I will not bow down to a lawless mob, or allow criminals to carry out the legitimate concerns of my constituents.”
Hawley mentioned that his constituents had contacted him about concerns over electoral integrity.
His comments came on the same day that House Democrats and 10 Republicans voted to objectively provoke President Trump for last week’s attack on American Tritol. Prior to that vote, both left and right targeted Havelis and his Texas ally, arguing that they should be held accountable for objecting to the certification.
“Those who have continued to support their dangerous gambling while objecting to the consequences of a lawful, democratic election will always be considered complex in an unprecedented attack against our democracy,” said Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah. Anarchy .
Some House Democrats also voiced support for a congressional resolution that held lawmakers like Hawley responsible. But according to the Missouri senator, he and others were facing a double standard.
Rules in CROZ DEFENDS Nakshatri Constituency: TO NOTHING TO DO ‘WITH CAPITOL RIOTS
Hawley wrote, “Democrats objected after the 2000, 2004 and 2016 elections. Every time a Republican has won the White House in the last thirty years.”
“And they were within their rights to do so. The Joint Session is a forum where concerns about an election can be raised, debated and eventually resolved with a vote.”
Halle specifically objected to Pennsylvania’s certification of his decision to extend mail-in voting, with some saying he violated the state’s constitution.
A longtime critic of the tech giants, Hawley also accused him of interfering in the country’s democratic process.
Click here to get the Fox News app
“I pointed out the unprecedented interference of Big Tech corporations in this election in favor of the Biden campaign, not just in Pennsylvania, but everywhere.”
“Their intervention in our democratic process has only intensified in recent times.”