Did Trump admit to something he really should not have in his tweet about Michael Flynn’s guilty plea? – tech2.org

Did Trump admit to something he really should not have in his tweet about Michael Flynn’s guilty plea?



[ad_1]

President Donald Trump, in his first comment on Michael Flynn's guilty plea to lying to the FBI, said there was "absolutely no collusion" between his campaign and Russia. (Reuters)

A little over 24 hours after Michael Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI, President Trump finally took to Twitter to offer his ideas. He wishes he had not done it.

In his first tweet on the subject since Flynn's plea, Trump argued that Flynn had no reason to lie about his actions because they were not illegal. But it is the first part of the tweet that caught the attention of many people.

"I had to fire General Flynn because he lied to the vice president and the FBI," Trump began.

Except when Trump dismissed Flynn on February 13, Flynn's conflicting comments to the FBI about his meeting with the Russian ambbadador were not public knowledge. And the current schedule as we understand it does not suggest that the White House had direct knowledge of what Flynn said at the time.

Flynn's comments to the FBI did not enter the public domain until three days after his dismissal, on February 16, when Sari Horwitz and Adam Entous of The Washington Post reported that Flynn had wrongly denied discussing sanctions with the Russian ambbadador: [19659009] Former national security adviser Michael Flynn denied FBI agents in an interview last month that he discussed US sanctions against Russia, with Russia's ambbadador to the United States before President Trump took office , contradicting the content of the intercepted communications collected by the intelligence agencies, said current and former officials of the United States.

The January 24 interview could put Flynn in legal danger. Lying to the FBI is a criminal offense. But several officials said it was unclear whether prosecutors would attempt to present a case, in part because Flynn could badyze the definition of the word "sanctions." He also followed his denial to the FBI saying he could not remember the entire conversation, officials said.

Any decision to prosecute would ultimately fall to the Department of Justice.

Some see a problematic admission in Trump's tweet on Saturday; possibly even something that could be interpreted as an admission to the obstruction of justice. Here's why:

The day after firing Flynn, on February 14, Trump urged then-FBI Director James B. Comey to be lenient with Flynn, according to Comey's notes at the time, saying: " I hope you can leave this. " Go. "If Trump really knew at that time that Flynn had lied to the FBI and was under investigation, according to the argument, it may constitute an attempt to obstruct that investigation.

Walter Shaub, the former head of the US Office. The ethics of the government, suggested that the tweet could be a big misstep for the president.

… could not resist commenting on Flynn.

ADMIT that he knew that Flynn had lied to the FBI when he asked Comey to support him outside Flynn ??????????????????????????????????????? ???? https: // t .co / HJWlUvC99F

– Walter Shaub (@waltshaub) December 2, 2017

Before we slip into an alternative universe of blatant corruption, this tweet could only have finished with a presidential administration.

– Walter Shaub (@wal tshaub) December 2, 2017

Others agreed, including the executive editor of Lawfare Susan Hen nessey, who said it amounted to a "confession of the essential elements of knowledge of an obstruction of justice accusation":

This is quite substantial confession to the essential elements of knowledge of an obstruction of justice charge. https://t.co/UpQfilPVfJ

– Susan Hennessey (@Susan_Hennessey) December 2, 2017

Still, it was probably not difficult for Trump and the White House to badume at the time that Flynn had been under investigation. Acting Attorney General Sally Yates told White House attorney Don McGahn on January 26, two days after the FBI interview, that Flynn had discussed sanctions in his phone calls with the Russian ambbadador. This was contrary to what Flynn had told the White House and Flynn opened to blackmail him, Yates said.

"We also told the White House lawyer that the FBI had interviewed General Flynn on [January] 24," Yates said. in the testimony of the Congress on May 8. "Mr. McGahn asked me how he did it, and I refused to give him an answer to that, and then we talked to Mr. McGahn essentially about why we were telling them about this and the first thing we did was explain to Mr. McGahn that the behavior The underlying issue in which General Flynn had been involved was problematic in itself, and secondly, we told him that we felt like the vice president and that others had a right to know that the information they transmitted to the American people was not true. "

Although Yates did not clearly tell McGahn that Flynn was under investigation, given the content of their conversation, including talking about Flynn's intercepted communications, it would not have been difficult to reach that conclusion.

So while McGahn was telling Trump about McGahn's conversation with Yates, it's likely that Trump knew Flynn was in legal danger when he spoke with Comey on February 14.

It is also possible that Trump was wrong to remember the chronology of what he knew when he fired his tweet on Saturday.

Either way, it does not change the fact that you just tweeted something you can regret.

[ad_2]
Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.