Dallas Cowboys proprietor Jerry Jones stated doable lawsuit vs. NFL has nothing to do with Ezekiel Elliott scenario

[ad_1]

FRISCO, Texas — Dallas Cowboys proprietor and common supervisor Jerry Jones stated the lawsuit he’s contemplating submitting towards the NFL and different homeowners has nothing to do with how poorly he believes Ezekiel Elliott has been handled within the league’s investigation into home violence.

While not happy that Elliott has been suspended for six video games after the operating again’s newest authorized battle fell brief, Jones’ greater situation is with the negotiations over Roger Goodell’s new contract.

2 Related

“I basically feel this extension of Roger should go and be reviewed and approved by all the owners, not just a few of the owners,” Jones stated on 105.three The Fan in Dallas. “The committee that mainly negotiates the wage with our commissioner is taking the view, particularly the chairman, that they in a restricted group can full this settlement.

“I disagree. I feel we must always, with the entire curiosity and dedication that you’ve all through the possession … that is merely about ensuring that each one golf equipment have enter into … the commissioner, his extension, but additionally in future years, his selections. We all see how impactful a commissioner’s determination could be in lots of areas. We’ve given him a variety of energy. I feel we want the checks and balances of possession having to truly be ready to not simply counsel however approve of his selections. So that is what that is about.”

“Every proprietor ought to be capable of have, relative to the commissioner’s pay, the discretion of hiring him or not hiring him. Every proprietor ought to shake his hand and look him within the eye.”

Jerry Jones, Cowboys proprietor

Jones stated his emotions in regards to the Elliott determination are separate from these regarding the Goodell negotiations.

“The information are, the problems that contain the commissioner are much more reaching,” Jones told the Cowboys’ flagship network. “I have been coping with this commissioner for nearly 28 years, as an worker of the NFL. Zeke’s been concerned right here a 12 months, a 12 months and a half. Those are actually separate points as to Zeke. The coverage that we have now that has impacted Zeke is extra of my situation with the commissioner, moreso than Zeke’s explicit circumstance.”

Elliott has an opportunity to regain eligibility at a Dec. 1 attraction listening to for a preliminary injunction in entrance of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Without the injunction, Elliott won’t be in uniform once more till Dec. 24 towards the Seattle Seahawks.

Jones has persistently supported Elliott because the home violence costs had been dropped at gentle in the summertime of 2016. He stated throughout coaching camp that he didn’t count on Elliott to be suspended and that there was no home violence concerned.

“I am dissatisfied when he is not going to play,” Jones said. “It’s what it’s. That’s not being resolute. It’s simply merely, it is what it’s. I actually fervently disagree that we should not have him on the enjoying discipline.”

Jones doesn’t consider the NFL ought to supersede authorized authorities. Elliott was not charged by Columbus, Ohio, authorities due to inconsistent testimony and proof.

Per the NFL’s private conduct coverage, a participant doesn’t have to be punished by the legislation to face self-discipline from the league.

“I would prefer to utterly take this commissioner’s title out of my response,” Jones said. “To a big diploma, it isn’t about Roger Goodell. It’s in regards to the energy of the commissioner because it pertains to possession. To the extent that the possession hires him, extends him, pays him on an ongoing foundation, the possession ought to have first-hand approval. Each proprietor ought to approve that.

“There’s an old adage, for instance, in politics that, if you’re going to give a candidate some money, you shouldn’t have that done by somebody in between you and the candidate — by some kind of intermediary. You should hand him the money and look him straight in the eye so he knows you did it. And consequently, every owner should be able to have, relative to the commissioner’s pay, the discretion of hiring him or not hiring him. Every owner should shake his hand and look him in the eye.”

[ad_2]
Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.