The announcement, which comes more than a month after the Supreme Court blocked President Donald Trump’s attempt to end deferred action for the Childhood Arrivals program, is intended to buy time while the administration is in its next Decides the steps.
Trump has repeatedly raided against DACA as part of his anti-immigration agenda, but has been unable to end the program after three years in his administration after a series of lawsuits. The latest attempt to keep the program limits in the 2020 election is likely to fuel uncertainty in the lives of thousands of migrants who are beneficiaries of the program or are planning to apply for it.
“The administration is now conducting a comprehensive review of the DACA program and the justifications introduced to make DACA winding down have a negative impact on the illegality and the program, including what I call ‘immigration behavior’, including trafficking and illegal crossings.” , “A senior administration official told reporters.
The White House arranged a phone briefing with reporters under which the officer would be given benami property.
“When the administration next works on DACA, it will be the basis for a comprehensive review of the justification for proposed legal and legal policies to end the program,” the official said.
Meanwhile, the administration will reject all initial requests and application fees for new applications “without prejudice” for future applications.
The administration will suspend all applications for renewal on a “case-by-case basis” in line with immigration law, but will provide renewal for one year instead of the current two years. And all applications for advanced parole “absent exceptional circumstances to be rejected”
The delay has left thousands of migrants who are eligible for the event and resentment among lawyers who disobey court orders to the government.
Wolf wrote, “I have concluded that the DACA policy presents, at the very least, serious policy concerns that may warrant its complete defense,”
Wolf justified the decision to dismiss the new applicants, saying that no reason for retaining the program “is completely lacking” in relation to those already enrolled.
Legal and Legislative Challenges
Peazi said at the time that new applications are being conducted – not rejected – while the policy is under consideration and that the Department of Justice is unable to “move forward” to the Department of Homeland Security.
DACA-eligible immigrants are waiting to move forward after the Supreme Court decision and the Maryland-related ruling.
Arlette Morales sent her DACA application weeks in advance. “I very much hope that they accept it … but I also have to be careful, because they can’t,” she told CNN. “It’s really hard. It’s really unexpected.”
Congress is the only body that can provide a permanent solution for DACA recipients through legislation. Last year, the House of Representatives introduced and passed the “Dream and Promise Act”, which would provide a pathway to citizenship for beneficiaries of the DACA program. The Senate has not taken it.
For years, Democratic and Republican lawmakers have tried – and failed – to pass legislation addressing this slice of the undisputed population.
In 2001, Sense Orrin Hatch, a Republican from Utah and a Democrat from Illinois, Dick Durbin introduced the “Foreign Minors Act for Development, Relief and Education”, also known as the DREAM Act. It sought to provide a path for legal status to young unspecified immigrants and earned children a group of undisputed immigrants brought to the US as The Moncair “Dreamers”.
Since then, there have been several iterations of the measure – while somewhat different – aimed to put the group on a path towards legal status. But the controversy between Democrats and Republicans over “Dreamers” makes it difficult to obtain a bipartisan agreement.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has already indicated that she is not willing to negotiate some points.
Pelosi told reporters in early June, “Our advocates for comprehensive immigration reform do not want to yield to us at any point. We must make comprehensive immigration reform. We will move in that direction.” “But we are not endangering families or have increased surveillance in our country.”
CNN’s Ariane de Vogue contributed to this report.