A divided Supreme Court allows President Donald Trump's ban on travel to the US UU From six majority Muslim countries take effect while legal challenges are presented, which gives an important victory and suggests that the court will finally respect the restrictions.
Trump will now be able to block or limit the entry of people from the Middle East and North African nations, even if they have a relationship with a person or institution based in the USA. UU The de facto order replaces a compromise reached by the judges in June, when they allowed a previous version of the ban to have a partial effect but exempted people with "genuine" American connections.
The main commercial group of the global airline industry reiterated its opposition to curbs, which affect people from Iran, Syria, Chad, Somalia, Libya and Yemen. The CEO of the International Air Transport Association, Alexandre de Juniac, said on Tuesday that the steps threaten to impose "unbearable limitations" on airlines and passengers.
"We are not in favor of travel bans," said De Juniac in Geneva, where an update on airline earnings "If a travel ban is to be imposed for urgent security needs, consult the industry before to correctly implement the set of measures ".
The Trump administration bet that the superior court would be more receptive to the latest version of the ban, which also prohibits the entry of people from North Korea and some officials of the Venezuelan government.
Judges Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor disagreed with the order. The lower courts had partially blocked the new policy, issuing orders that tracked the June Supreme Court decision.
The new order does not directly address the merits of legal challenges. Two federal appeals courts are scheduled to hear the arguments in the next few days. The higher court may agree to consider the appeals later, perhaps soon enough for a decision during the current period ending in June.
The administration argued that the latest version of the ban, announced on September 24, was put in place after national security officials meticulously reviewed the country-by-country investigation procedures. The Department of Homeland Security could add or remove travel restrictions to countries when conditions change.
Policy challengers say that Trump is exceeding his authority under federal immigration law and violating the Constitution by targeting Muslims.