Connecticut puts some teeth in mask mandate, will start issuing $ 100 fine

The Connecticut governor will sign an executive order Tuesday designed to kill people where it hurts – in the wallet – if they refuse to wear masks to help curb the spread of Kovid-19 We do.

Thirty-four states and the District of Columbia have orders to wear masks in public, but the government Ned Lamont order has made Connecticut one of the few states that will issue fines to those who do not comply. From midnight on Thursday, residents can be fined $ 100 if they are caught violating the masked mandate.

Before LaMont’s order, the Connecticut police only had to punish those who ignored the masked mandate, charging them with a misdemeanor that was considered highly punitive, with the state’s chief operating officer, Josh Gebley, from Hartford. Told the court.

“There really wasn’t much to be done, because a lot of people watched [a misdemeanor charge] If you can’t make a distance socially, then masks are too harsh to fail to wear, ”said Gable. “So he asked for this new tool, an infection that was a bit of a step-down enforcement.”

In addition to providing law enforcement with “a new device”, Lamont’s order also outlined how statewide uniformity applies to how the masked mandate would be implemented.

For example, towns such as Simsbury had already fined $ 250 for violations of masks or physical distance orders.

Gable said, “It comes up again and again, where we felt it was appropriate to do it.”

The Lamont executive order includes a fine of $ 250 for attending indoor events with more than 25 people, or large outdoor gatherings with more than 100 people. And those who conduct these unmodified events are subject to a $ 500 fine.

Will these really be fined for not wearing working masks?

Brian Higgins, a professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice and a former police chief in Bergen County, New Jersey, said he is not so sure.

Higgins told NBC News, “People still don’t stop speeding because there is a fine, people still don’t stop at a stop sign because there’s a penalty.” “I think it will have some impact but I think it will still be difficult to implement.


“Here’s the problem,” he said. “Technically, if you are not socially capable of distance, then you should only wear masks. So, it becomes a decision call for whoever is implementing it. Also, this is the moving level. People are seen applying the mask in one place, not in another. “

The result is widespread confusion as to when and where to wear a mask that makes some people angry and less cooperative.

“I see the climax all the time,” said Higgins. “I see people walking alone down a wooden path wearing masks. I see people who are hellbent on not wearing masks walking in the crowd. In my house, rules are rules and we follow rules. “

Pauly Price, a professor of law and public health at Emory University in Atlanta, said the fine could be effective for some people “on the same principle that speeding of tickets and traffic fines seat belt use and other traffic safety” Encourages issues. “

“So, it may be that just the possibility of a fix may force more people to follow otherwise,” she said.

But Price said she was doubtful whether paying the fine was “a good use of police time.” She said that what could be more effective is the “no shoes, no shirt, no service” concept that is currently being adopted to include masks at many stores and other indoor locations.

“But shop owners need to be prepared to confront non-customer customers, and the local police force is ready to respond to ‘trespass’ and disturbances,” she said.

Other courts outside of Connecticut have also either proposed or imposed penalties on those who continue to carry out masked mandates.

For example, while California does not have a statewide penalty for not wearing a mask in public, some local governments have imposed their own fines. And in Illinois, the emergency rule of the government J.B. Pritzker that would do business of up to $ 2,500 for not enforcing mandatory masking rules survived a challenge by Republicans in the state Legislature.

According to the latest NBC News data, the Connecticut epidemic was difficult in the early days, when it was concentrated in the Northeast and 4,485 deaths out of 54,895 were confirmed.

Meanwhile, New York City commuters who refuse to wear masks on the metro, buses and other trains now have to pay a $ 50 fine.

While Connecticut was able to level the curve, the state’s positivity rate has increased from 1 percent to 1.2 percent in recent days as more colleges and schools have reopened, a fact that Lamont said the new executive In his decision to sign the order.

But in general, Lamont said on Monday, “I think the number is still moving in the right direction.”

The same cannot be said anywhere else as the United States issued reports of thousands more cases and some 800 additional deaths every day, while the total number of deaths from the epidemic is close to 200,000.

President Donald Trump privately told reporter Bob Woodward that in seven months coronovirus was “lethal stuff”, the U.S. continued to lead the world with 195,866 deaths and more than 6.5 million confirmed cases, NBC News figures released Tuesday Done.

According to John Hopkins University Kovid-19, Trump has denied lying to the American public about the severity of the pandemic, but right now America has one-fifth of the world’s 929,444 people and one-fifth of more than 29.3 million cases. . Dashboard.

Most of the new deaths and cases continue to arise in the Southern and Sun Belt states, which resumed in May at Trump’s insistence, as if the epidemic was going to have its worst impact. Also to see an increase in cases of late are mid-western states like South Dakota, which last month hosted a raucous motorcycle rally in the city of Sturgis where almost no physical disturbances or 400,000 or so wearing masks . People attending the 10-day festival.

In other coronovirus news:

  • Most Americans do not trust what Trump says about the development of a potential coronavirus vaccine according to the latest NBC news. Twenty-five percent of adults say they do not trust the president’s commentary comments, 26 percent said they did, and 20 percent fall into the “not aware” category. But most Republicans continue to trust Trump on this issue, despite the fact that he has made several predictions about the introduction of such vaccines, most of them compared to predictions by scientists and public health officials Are far more optimistic.

  • According to a new study by scientists at the Columbia University Mailman School, there was an epidemic outbreak in New York City in the city when the transmission of “Kovid-19 decreased by nearly 70 percent”. Department of Public Health and Health and Mental Hygiene of New York City. The scientists concluded, “Extensive use of face coverings contributed to an additional 7 percent reduction, and a reduction of up to 20 percent in people 65 and older. New York City currently has an infection rate of less than one percent and The city has slowly begun to reopen restaurants and other locations, albeit at limited capacity. Back in March and April, New York and the rest of the Empire State were the country’s hottest spots and killed thousands, while the public Health officials tried to figure out how to contain the crisis. New York still leads the nation with 33,886 deaths – most of them from the onset of the epidemic.

  • For the first time in its 175-year history, Scientific American magazine has endorsed a presidential candidate. And this is not Trump. The venerable publication cited the president’s poor epidemic performance as it is breaking with tradition and the support of Democrat Joe Biden. “The evidence and science show that Donald Trump has badly harmed America and its people – because he rejects evidence and science,” the editors wrote. He said that Trump failed to develop a national strategy to stop the crisis and lied repeatedly to Americans. “His lies encouraged people to engage in risky behavior, spread the virus further, and inspired weddings among Americans who take the threat seriously and who believe Trump’s lies,” he wrote .
  • Kovid-19 deaths related to a Maine wedding held at an indoor wedding venue in violation of state attendance limits have now risen to five and the total number of infections now exceeds 175. There are none of the five people who died. Married on August 7 or the camp ground at Begin in Cabin and Campground Millincet, 70 miles north of Bangor. But one of the guests was an employee of the York County Jail, where 72 cases have been linked to the gathering, health officials have said.
  • Most children and adolescents who died from Kovid-19 suffer from Black, Hispanic or underlying conditions, the federal Disease Control and Prevention said in a new report. The researchers came to their conclusion after a close look at the cases of 121 children and adolescents who died of coronovirus on 12 July and 12 July. Obesity and asthma were the most common underlying condition, he found. And 75 patients were Hispanic, Black and American Indian / Alaska Natives. Dr. Rishi Desai, who did not participate in the report, but is a former infectious disease officer of the CDC, said it did not surprise him that most of the fatal minorities were children and adolescents. “What was surprising was not even close,” he told NBC News. “The amount of difference was striking.”