care to elaborate? “No,” said Mr. Wallace. “To quote the president, ‘This is what it is.”
In the headlines, Mr. Wallace was well aware of the complexity of his task: ensuring a debate, refraining from taking sides, allowing candidates to express themselves while maintaining the discussion.
“You are reluctant – as someone has said from the beginning that I wanted to be as invisible as possible, and to enable them to talk – at which point you start interfering more and more,” Mr. . Wallace said. “To say first, ‘Please don’t come in the middle,’ then ‘Please follow the rules, and thirdly,’ This is not serving the country well.” Those are all drastic steps in real time, at that time. “
On the presidential suit, the commission said on Wednesday that it would investigate changes to the format of the remaining bouts of this year between Mr. Biden and Mr. Trump, a clear sign of its disappointment with the results Tuesday evening. The commission also pained Mr Wallace for praising his “professionalism and skills”.
The suggestion that arbitrators are given the power to mute the candidates’ microphones – popularized on social media in the hours following the incident – did not sit well with Mr. Wallace.
“As a practical matter, even if the president’s microphone was switched off, he could continue to be interrupted, and it could well be picked up on Biden’s microphone, and it still Used to disrupt proceedings in the hall, ”he said. .
And he said that cutting the audio feed of the presidential candidate is a more creditable result than some pundits. “People have to remember, and many people forget, these two candidates have the support of tens of millions of Americans,” he said.
C-SPAN’s Steve Scully is set to resolve the next debate, in a town-hall format where Florida voters will ask many questions. Kristen Welker of NBC News is the moderator for the final debate. Mr. Wallace’s advice: “If a person goes down this road, I hope you realize that it will be faster than what I was doing.” I did not have that advance warning. “