Safeway made enough to submit a gift card after a worker's job to be able to; Obtaining a workplace by a member of staff: a tribunal

HELP THE FILE: A B.C. The Human Rights Tribunal has complained about human rights against Safeway who refused to tell a worker a sex joke maker.

Don Healy / / Regina Leader-Post

Safeguard administration decision to be & # 39; giving an excuse by e-mail and a $ 250 gift card enough compensation to a shopkeeper who will ask a worker on his / her. case cut by type, according to B.C. Human Rights Management Tribunals.

The regime tells that the event was held in mid-October 2017 when Brianne Duke and a member of the family bought at Lockaby's Kensington Square Safeway.

The Duke said a worker wanted her and said to her: "I have an unfavorable thing to tell you."

She said he told a number of scenes, one of them "What is the late stalwart saying? I'm commissioning & # 39 ;."

Shortly after the incident, a Duke's representative informed the owner of his shop – Sobey & West Inc. – a & # 39; describing the event as "unsuitable and unprofitable." The letter letter requested that the Duke receives a $ 250 gift card and a public excuse on all Safeway Canada social media accounts.

Sobey answered, asking more information to check. After receiving that information, Sobey identified the worker, who included telling the "joke" as long as he was in. keep a cumin spice vessel.

The man said that he had been selling the spice bark when he asked a number of buyers and other staff if he would say something inaccurate.

According to tribunal justice, Sobey controlled the worker and within two weeks of the event he executed a Duke's $ 250 gift card and gift card.

Before his cart was displayed, the Duke sent to Sobey to prove his / her; card on his way and ask if the worker was still working at his shop. She said she was not comfortable to buy at that place if it was there.

The same day, the Duke sent a complaint to the tribunal, saying that it was discriminated against by gender (Section 8 of B.C. Code of Human Rights).

Although Sobey says that the incidents did not belong to discrimination, McCreary responded to her; case under section 27 (1) (d) (ii), which allows the tribunal to refuse a complaint where it would not promote the causes of its decision; Code Post-

"I understand Sobey wants to verify that the events are not discriminatory under the code, but for the purposes of this analysis, I accept , not to decide, they will do that, "McCreary wrote.

However, McCreary wrote that Sobey had proven rapidly, the event took place and gave him a gift card and an excuse.

"The parties are encouraged to deal with complaints that may be as soon as possible to ensure that discrimination has been discriminated, it is & # 39; Responding to the intention that resolution is as fast as possible, "write it. "Sobey seems to have done this here."

So, the complaint was rejected.

The Duke told the News Postmedia: "I'm very tired of the management and I'm glad it was known as generic harassment, and I am happy to offer and pay Sobey's compensation on the case set. "

Source link

About canada