“It was not only disturbing, but humiliating,” said Nina Turner, Sanders’ former campaign co-chairman, who served on the committee. “Disgusting, disturbing, unacceptable. And this is no way to restore the trust of those who already suspect the Democratic Party is unfair. “
Another person at the meeting described it as a cross-talk between a small number of people in both the Biden and Sanders camps, making it difficult to hear the proceedings, adding that some people did not know to use the mute button.
The Democratic National Committee did not immediately respond to requests for comment. A Biden officer disputed the account with Sanders appointments.
“This is an abuse. There was a small group that was sinking the speakers, and it continued through a tribute to the late Rep. John Lewis, “said the man, who refused to speak on the record.” They were stopped by both Sanders and Biden representatives Was asked for. And the overwhelming conclusion of this meeting was five resolutions that were unanimously passed as a result of the hard work of the Sanders and Biden teams. “
The spat began when Brent Welder, who appointed a Sanders to the convention’s committee of the convention, moved a proposal to change the party charter to disallow all corporate PAC dollars and prevent corporate lobbyists from serving on the DNC for many years.
A Biden appointment called for it, which some Sanders appointments said they were caught by guards. “Tumbling until?” Asked the welder.
“In general, until someone makes a successful proposal to remove it from the table,” said former representative Barney Frank, co-chair of the meeting. “After the committee’s deadline expires, if no one has moved successfully to remove it from the table, it dies with the committee.”
“Wow, that makes no sense,” said Welder.
Jillian Johnson, who appointed Sanders on the committee, said other Sanders supporters urged that a motion for a vote be brought to the closed-door breakout room by changing background images on their screens to reflect their support. He said that some Biden appointments promoted progressiveness over this.
“You’re acting like children,” someone said, and, ‘you were going to lose anyway, so get over it,’ he said. “And then the host closed the meeting, so we couldn’t see each other.”
Welder and another Sanders appointee who asked for alimony also said Biden appointments made these comments. Turner said he heard them as well, adding that they came from Biden appointments or “party deaths”.
Before the meeting ended, the committee held a vote to consider the welder’s proposal, which was supported. His original amendment was then defeated.
While Sanders’ disappointment dominated social media, the actual arguments in private breakout rooms were not live-streamed – a boon for the party. Such a division could be captured on tape if the meeting was held in person, as the Rules Committee usually operates.
On a separate issue on Thursday, the Rules Committee struck a deal between Sanders and Biden teams to spur party reforms, which were agreed in the wake of the controversial 2016 election.
The Rules Committee voted unanimously to pass a resolution to “maintain advances” for the presidential nomination process, such as not allowing Provides overdue voting on the first ballot and making the caucus more accessible.
The Sanders and Biden camps hoped the proposal would reconcile the party. improvement, What will now be known for a vote of convention delegates will be cemented for the 2024 presidential primary.
In an effort to maintain unity, Sanders’ 2020 campaign officials told Sanders to withdraw and vote against some amendments as he struggled with the deal he made with the Biden team.
The plan to create a limited role for the superdelegates was defeated by the committee.
“The rules are passed today, taking into account the significant changes made four years ago to ensure that our party’s presidential candidate is selected by rank and file Democrats,” Sanders said in a statement. “I would like to thank the Biden campaign, the representatives and the members of the committee who made this agreement. It very simply says that the will of the people should come first.”