Anti-abortion faith leaders use support for COVID-19 vaccines


In a growing consensus, religious leaders at the forefront of the anti-abortion movement in the United States are telling their followers to remotely and indirectly take the lines of leading vaccine-derived cells available to combat COVID-19. Accepted for From fetuses.

A vocal enemy of abortion, based in Dallas, Southern Baptist megachurch pastor Robert Jeffress, has called vaccines “God-exists.”

Jeffress said via email, “To ask God for help but refuse when your house is on fire, the vaccine doesn’t matter much more than calling 911.” “There is no valid belief-based reason for refusing to take the vaccine.”

The Rev. Al Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, has also celebrated his development.

He said, “I can take this not only for what I hope will be good for my own health, but also for others.”

The American Conference of Catholic Bishops, which says that fighting abortion is its “major” priority, said last month that vaccination against coronovirus “should be understood as an act of charity towards other members of our community”, a According to the statement by the chairman of its committee and the chairmen of the committee on pro-life activities.

Bishop said it is morally acceptable for Catholics to use one of the two vaccines approved for use in the US – by Pfizer and Modern – despite “remote connections to morally compromised cell lines”. This implicated the use of embryonic cell lines for laboratory tests to confirm the vaccine’s effectiveness.

Another major vaccine, which was produced by AstraZeneca and approved for use in Britain and some other countries, is “more morally compromised” and should be avoided if there are available alternatives, Bishop said.

In tandem with the USCCB, four bishops in Colorado issued their statement adopting a somewhat more negative stance on AstraZeneca, describing it as “not a morally valid option”.

AstraZeneca used a cell line called HEK293 to develop its vaccine. According to the Oxford University team that developed it, the original HEK293 cells were taken from the kidneys of a fetus in 1973, but the cells now used are clones of the original cells and not the original embryonic tissue.

As approvals passed the vaccine earlier last year, some Catholic bishops warned that they might be morally unacceptable. Among them was Bishop Joseph Brennan of Fresno, California, who urged Catholics not to jump on the “vaccine bandwagon”.

He later revised his stance, stating that due to health risks to individuals and communities, “Catholics may morally decide serious reasons for the use of such vaccines.”

Also questioning the vaccines was Bishop Joseph Strickland of Tyler, Texas, who has portrayed any use of abortion fetuses in vaccine development as evil, and says he does not have any of the currently available vaccines Will take

“The church has stated that it is permissible to receive the vaccine under certain circumstances and I do not dispute it,” he said via email. “The church has also said that we should strictly call for morally produced vaccines, and I urge those who take the vaccine to join that mission and demand change.”

Strickland is encouraging donations to the John Paul II Medical Research Institute, which supports research aimed at developing “ethical” cell lines – which use adults’ stem cells – using vaccines and other therapies The remedies will be used in the making.

Some other outspoken anti-abortion bishops have administered vaccines.

“As a Christian world engages, it is impossible, in many settings, to avoid moral evil altogether,” Bishop Thomas Tobin of Providence, Rhode Island tweeted. “The Church, on many levels, stated that it is morally acceptable to obtain currently available vaccines. I agree.”

Bishop Richard Stika of Knoxville, Tennessee, said he had no qualms about vaccinating.

He joked on Twitter, “I hope they won’t be able to detect by putting a microchip in my arm that I cheat on their food.”

Protestant evangelical leaders, who generally hold strong anti-abortion views, have relatively little anti-vaccine rhetoric, according to the Rev. Russell Moore, who heads the Southern Baptist Convention’s public policy.

“I wouldn’t think of an evangelical pastor saying, ‘Don’t comment,'” he said.

A more significant challenge for Pastor, Moore said, is combating unfounded anti-vaccine conspiracies embraced by some members of his congregation or communities – for example that vaccines would alter the recipient’s DNA or implant a microchip.

Globally, the Vatican has largely issued guidelines similar to those of American bishops, which are morally acceptable to Catholics, which, based on research, allow them to receive the COVID-19 vaccine from aborted fetuses Receive cells use.

One difference: It does not provide or give details about specific vaccines. The Vatican plans to use the Pfizer vaccine for employees and their families starting this week, and Pope Francis – in an interview broadcast to an Italian broadcaster this weekend – said he To be vaccinated.

The Vatican has suggested that it is wrong to refuse a vaccine altogether on the basis of an abortion objection, because refusal “may threaten others.”

Ninekor Austraco, a molecular biologist and Catholic pastor who teaches at universities in the US and the Philippines, said the Vatican has appropriately addressed faith-based concerns about indirectly linked vaccines for research that uses abortive embryonic cells We do.

Ostralco stated, “When the moral cell was created in the 1970s, moral evil was considered.”

G. Kevin Donovan, a pediatrician at Georgetown University who directs his Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics, said his Catholicism leaders could not have been “more clear-cut”.

Donovan said, “There is an advantage for Catholics … the highest levels of authority have made it clear that this is a morally acceptable thing.”

In Indonesia, home to the world’s largest Muslim population, a Muslim clerical council has been included in that country’s vaccine procurement process to ensure that the product is halal or acceptable under Islamic law. In the past, the council has decided that some vaccines for other diseases were unacceptable because they used pork-derived gelatin.

But on Friday, the council approved China’s Synovac COVID-19 vaccine, paving the way for its distribution in Indonesia.

© Copyright 2021 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This content may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.