Home / Others / AMD is ready to run again when the Zombie Lead attacks Intel

AMD is ready to run again when the Zombie Lead attacks Intel




<div _ngcontent-c14 = "" innerhtml = "

Zombieload attacks Intel processors but leaves AMD alone.

Getty

AMD rose 69% last year. Can you do it again? Tony Mitchell, who has outperformed all of the US UU Mutual funds of capital in the last 10 and 15 years, we must first buy AMD in January 2018 and make it its first option for 2019., which does not seem to affect the AMD CPUs.

Why AMD rose 69% last year?

In January 2018, when Intel revealed that its CPUs were vulnerable to attacks called Specter and Meltdown, they released software patches to fix the problem. However, early reports revealed that Intel patches reduced CPU performance by 5% to 25%. Intel said that performance degradation depended on the workload and that, since most people do not fully use their CPU, they do not notice it.

While it is true for most users, there are customers who use their CPUs completely: corporate data centers. For these customers, installing a patch that reduces CPU performance by 25% is like a 25% increase in the price, since they now have to buy 5 CPUs to do the same job that 4 used to do.

This did not immediately benefit AMD because Intel said that Specter and Meltdown were problems throughout the industry, which means that AMD CPUs were equally affected. This turned out to be only partially true.

AMD CPUs are significantly less vulnerable to Specter and Meltdown because AMD CPUs do not use the function that these attacks exploit. While not immune to these attacks, the AMD software does not exactly match the same performance penalty as Intel's. The advantage of AMD in the data center market is that shares increased 69% in 2018.

It's happening again

The researchers who discovered Specter and Meltdown discovered a vulnerability called zombie load that affects all Intel CPUs since 2011. It is important to note that they say that AMD CPUs do not seem to be affected.

Apple just announced that enabling software patches to completely mitigate zombie loads, which they call microarchitecture data sampling (MDS), caused a performance reduction of up to 40% in their tests. I want to see what performance degradation is in Red Hat, Centos, Ubuntu and other flavors of Linux, but this looks good for AMD.

My tasks: While, no doubt, Intel will have a way to spread this news that is more favorable to them, I prefer to depend on the views of Tony Mitchell when it comes to the investment implications.

Tony bought AMD for the first time in October 2014 at $ 3.45. He recommended AMD in January 2018 and made it his. first selection for 2019 when he was at $ 19. At today's price of $ 27, he has already made a lot of money with his original investment and sees much more potential in 2019.

Tony's Internet Fund has a track record of more than 18 years spanning 2 market shocks, numerous corrections and sector rotations. During that period, Tony averaged 17.50% per year, which compares well with the 5.83% return of S & P 500 for the same period. It is above 31% compared to the previous year. 18% for the S & P 500.

When you are notified when Tony updates your views, Click here. To be notified when I write about specific actions like AMD and Intel that my managers cover, Click here.

">

Zombieload attacks Intel processors but leaves AMD alone.

Getty

AMD rose 69% last year. Can you do it again? Tony Mitchell, who has outperformed all of the US UU Mutual funds of capital for the past 10 and 15 years, the first duty is to buy AMD in January 2018 and make it their first choice by 2019. The story can be repeated, as it has recently been revealed that Intel's CPUs are vulnerable to a new attack called zombie boot, which does not seem to affect the AMD CPUs.

Why AMD rose 69% last year?

In January 2018, when Intel revealed that its CPUs were vulnerable to attacks called Specter and Meltdown, they released software patches to fix the problem. However, early reports revealed that Intel patches reduced CPU performance by 5% to 25%. Intel said that performance degradation depended on the workload and that, since most people do not fully use their CPU, they do not notice it.

While it is true for most users, there are customers who use their CPUs completely: corporate data centers. For these customers, installing a patch that reduces CPU performance by 25% is like a 25% increase in the price, since they now have to buy 5 CPUs to do the same job that 4 used to do.

This did not immediately benefit AMD because Intel said that Specter and Meltdown were problems throughout the industry, which means that AMD CPUs were equally affected. This turned out to be only partially true.

AMD CPUs are significantly less vulnerable to Specter and Meltdown because AMD CPUs do not use the function that these attacks exploit. While not immune to these attacks, the AMD software does not exactly match the same performance penalty as Intel's. The advantage of AMD in the data center market is that shares increased 69% in 2018.

It's happening again

The researchers who discovered Specter and Meltdown discovered a vulnerability called zombie load that affects all Intel CPUs since 2011. It is important to note that they say that AMD CPUs do not seem to be affected.

Apple just announced that enabling software patches to completely mitigate zombie loads, which they call microarchitecture data sampling (MDS), caused a performance reduction of up to 40% in their tests. I want to see what performance degradation is in Red Hat, Centos, Ubuntu and other flavors of Linux, but this looks good for AMD.

My tasks: While, no doubt, Intel will have a way to spread this news that is more favorable to them, I prefer to depend on the views of Tony Mitchell when it comes to the investment implications.

Tony bought AMD for the first time in October 2014 at $ 3.45. He recommended AMD in January 2018 and it became his first choice for 2019, when he was at $ 19. At today's price of $ 27, he has already made a lot of money with his original investment and sees much more potential in 2019.

Tony's Internet Fund has a track record of more than 18 years spanning 2 market shocks, numerous corrections and sector rotations. During that period, Tony averaged 17.50% per year, which compares well with the 5.83% return of the S & P 500 for the same period. It is above 31% compared to the previous year. 18% for the S & P 500.

When Tony updates his views, click here. To be notified when I write about specific actions like AMD and Intel that my managers cover, click here.


Source link