Home / World / 5 conclusions of the accusation of piracy of the Russian elections

5 conclusions of the accusation of piracy of the Russian elections



WASHINGTON – When the US presidential election entered the final leg in 2016, a dozen Russian military intelligence officers dispersed throughout Moscow, unleashing a massive cyber-operation to disrupt the vote.

That's according to an accusation issued on Friday that officials said they developed malicious computer code known as malware, hacked into Democratic Party computers and silently watched unskilled employees write.

The Russians stole the secret files of the Democrats. They took snapshots of their screens. They used fake emails to trick Hillary Clinton's employees and expose their passwords.

And then, says the accusation, the Russians divulged their stolen information to the world.

Here is a look at what is in the indictment:

THE HACKING WAS CONNECTED TO THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT

The accusation said that the Main Directorate of Intelligence of Russia, known as GRU , had several units that "carried out large-scale cyber operations" to interfere with the 2016 US presidential election. [19659008] One of the units was based on an unpretentious side street in the Khimki suburb of Moscow, in a building which is referred to within the GRU as the "Tower", according to the accusation. Another had its headquarters near the center of Moscow, not far from the headquarters of the Ministry of Defense.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has consistently asserted that Russia was not involved in piracy or any attempt to interfere with US elections. But GRU is part of the state machine, and its participation would indicate that Putin was very involved in the effort.

THE HACKING WAS A SOPHISTICATED OPERATION

According to the indictment, the Russian piracy operation was so precise that they were able to identify specific computers within the Democratic Campaign arm of the House, the Congressional Democratic Campaign Committee and the Democratic National Committee that stored information related to the elections. They were able to search the computers for certain terms, such as "Hillary", "Cruz" and "Trump". They also copied folders, including opposition research and field operation plans.

The Russians concealed their participation through fake email addresses and identities and a network of computers located throughout the world, including in the United States. They paid for their infrastructure using cryptocurrencies.

TRUMP ASKED THE RUSSIAN TO CLICK ON CLINTON, AND THEY DID

The accusation says that the Russians used "spearphishing" – a technique used to steal passwords or gain access to computers – through the summer of 2016 to hack individuals associated with the Clinton campaign.

An attempt noted in the indictment seems to occur hours after Donald Trump suggested the Russians look for Clinton's emails. On the morning of July 27, 2016, Trump delivered a speech in which he said "Russia, if you are listening", he would love to take a look at the thousands of emails that Clinton said she had removed from her position as secretary. of state.

The indictment points to an attempted piracy later that day, saying that "after hours" the Russians tried to "launch email accounts for the first time in a domain hosted by a third party provider and used by Clinton staff" In the indictment, he says the Russians attacked more than 300 people associated with the Clinton campaign, the DCCC and the DNC, "the prosecution notes, with approximately 76 emails in the Clinton campaign domain

. ] RUSSIA COMMUNICATED WITH A PERSON AFFILIATED WITH TRUMPETS

The indictment does not claim that any Americans, including Trump campaign officials, were consciously in contact with Russian intelligence officials, but it does say that the Russians wrote to a anonymous person "who was in regular contact with veteran members of the Donald J. Trump presidential campaign."

On August 15, 2016, the Russians wrote On, according to the indictment: "Thanks for writing again … do you find anything interesting in the documents I published? "

Two days later, the Russians added," please tell me if I can help them anyway … it would be a great pleasure for me. "

In September, the Russians wrote the person again and they referred to a stolen DCCC document posted online. "What do you think of the information on the participation model for the full Democratic presidential campaign?"

The person responded, "(p) standard retty", according to the indictment

THE RUSSIAN STEALED THE VOTER'S INFORMATION [19659025] The indictment says that the Russians have hacked the website of a state election board and have stolen the information of approximately 500,000 voters, including names, addresses Social security numbers, birth dates and driver's license numbers Also hacked into a national election provider that provided software used to verify registration information or of voters.

Federal officials have said that the state electoral sites in at least 18 states were investigated by the Russians. The indictment adds county offices – specifically in Georgia, Florida and Iowa – to the list of electoral management sites it allegedly visited "to identify vulnerabilities."

Department of Homeland Security officials have said there is no evidence of manipulation of election results with during the 2016 intrusions.

___

Associated Press writers Eric Tucker and Lynn Berry in Washington and Frank Bajak in Pittsburgh contributed to this report.

Copyright 2018 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material can not be published, transmitted, rewritten or redistributed.

.


Source link