14-year-old videogame game sued, mom says she’s a scapegoat


Last month, Epic took the unusual step of not only banning the game from two players Fortnite of the game, but taking them to court. Since then it has been revealed that one of the defendants is only 14 years old and his mother is not happy.

  Article preview thumbnail
Epic Is Suing Two Alleged Fortnite Cheaters

On Tuesday, Fortnite publisher Epic Games filed civil suits against two alleged badociates of …

Read more Read

He went directly to the court through a letter, which attacks the handling of the case for several reasons. [19659006] She says that the terms of Fortnite require parental consent for minors, and that she never gave this consent.

  • She says the case is based on a loss of profits, but argues that it is a free video game, and that to prove a loss, Epic would need to provide a statement that Rogers' traps directly caused a "mbadive loss of earnings".
  • She states that by pursuing individual players, rather than the websites that sell / provide the software necessary to cheat in an online game, Epic is "using a 14-year-old boy as a scapegoat".
  • She claims that her son did not, as Epic claims, helped create the cheat software, but simply downloaded it as a user, and that Epic "does not have the ability to prove any form of modification."
  • Finally, the mother says that by publicly disclosing the name of her son in conjunction with the movement that Epic has violated the laws of Delaware related to the disclosure of information about minors. [19659011] There is also the issue, as TorrentFreak points out that a minor can not be sued directly, which increases the likelihood that Epic would not know the defendant's full identity before proceeding with the case.

    You can read the letter in its entirety below:

    Cases started last month, when Epic began taking action against individual users who had used (and were allegedly badociated with) the site Addicted Cheats to get "aimbots" that would give them an ive edge competition in the game.

    These cheating services are not free, and players pay between $ 5 and $ 15 a month for them.

    Epic has decided to take users to court, instead of simply banning them, after deciding that the modification of the game code goes against the Fortnite End User License Agreement and the Copyright law.

    "This lawsuit in particular arose as a result of the defendant's presenting a DMCA counterclaim to a removal notice in a YouTube video that exposed and promoted Fortnite Battle Royale tricks and exploits," Epic says in a statement . ] Kotaku . "Under these circumstances, the law requires us to file a lawsuit or drop the claim.

    " Epic does not agree to ongoing infringement or copyright infringement by any person at any age. As stated above, we take cheating seriously, and we will look for all available options to make sure our games are fun, fair and competitive for players. "

    UPDATE : ] 9:40 pm More details were added to the summary of complaints from the mother for those who can not see the image clearly on the mobile.

    ] UPDATE : 10:50 p.m. – Added Epic Statement

  • [ad_2]
    Source link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published.