Artemis program The landing site issue came up with agency leaders in two separate incidents this week, beginning with NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstein Comments to open digital meeting The Lunar Exploration Analysis Group, conducted by a NASA advisory group, was conducted on Monday (September 14).
“For the first mission, Artemis 3, Our aim is to achieve the South Pole, “Bridenstein said.” But … it wouldn’t surprise me if, for example, if we made a determination that the South Pole might be out of reach for Artemis 3, which I am. This is not to say whether Apollo can win interest in the sites.
related: See the moon like Apollo astronauts with these epic panoramic photos
NASA’s current pressure on the Moon began in March 2019, when Vice President Mike Pence directed the agency to expedite the timeline to return humans to the Moon, aiming for a 2024 landing at the South Pole. This area is intriguing to clan explorers because it hides water ice in dark pits where sunlight can never reach it.
Ice can be turned into drinking water, breathable air, and rocket fuel – at least, theoretically; Scientists are not yet sure how much ice is there and how easy it is to process. But, he Resource for Hope has made the South Pole of the Moon A priority destination. It is a particularly hypnotized goal in the context of developing a permanent presence on the Moon, which is, more accurately, a presence that will be sustained by the Moon itself.
But now, it seems, NASA is preparing for the possibility that it will need a back-up plan. Lunar poles are more difficult to reach than equatorial regions, so it can be found that if the agency hits the bottlenecks, it can salvage the 2024 deadline by substituting a simpler landing site.
And if the agency is focused on the equatorial region of the moon, a handful of sites are immediately tangled: six Apollo Landing Site, Where astronauts discovered between 1969 and 1972.
“The question is, well, if you’re going to go to the equator again, how will you learn the most? And you can argue that you will learn the most by going to the places where we put the gear; past,” Bridenstein he said. “There may be scientific discoveries.”
And revisiting an Apollo landing site would have implications beyond science, Bridenstein said. “The inspiration to simply go back to an original Apollo site would be very surprising,” he said. “And establishing norms of behavior – we want to make sure those sites are protected forever, so I think there is opportunity there as well.”
On Wednesday (16 September) Kathy Lieders, Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations Directorate, felt that the South Pole Landing site was no longer set in stone, According to SpacePolicyOnline.com Reporting on the Washington Space Business Roundtable Event.
“We’re really looking at a bunch of different options to make a decision,” SpacePolicyOnline.com reported that Lieders said. “We’re looking at different ways to get more communities to participate in that decision. We know that … wherever the initial mission is a big interest and that’s why we really find a way to get more Trying … participation in this. So, more to come. ”
Email Meghan Bartels at mbartels[email protected] or follow her on Twitter @meaganbartels. Follow us @Spacedotcom on Twitter and on Facebook.